Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119362›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2023

Pathogen-based target attainment of optimized continuous infusion dosing regimens of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem in surgical ICU patients: a prospective single center observational study.

Thomas De Corte, Jarne Verhaeghe, Sofie Dhaese, Sarah Van Vooren, Jerina Boelens, Alain G Verstraete, Veronique Stove, Femke Ongenae, Liesbet De Bus, Pieter Depuydt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas De CorteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Thomas.decorte@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5011-6640
Jarne VerhaegheIDLab, Ghent University-Imec, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-150X
Sofie DhaeseDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2252-7167
Sarah Van VoorenDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-1895
Jerina BoelensDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-8194
Alain G VerstraeteDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-3315
Veronique StoveDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-971X
Femke OngenaeIDLab, Ghent University-Imec, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2529-5477
Liesbet De BusDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-5857
Pieter DepuydtDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5164-5376
Sofie Van HoeckeIDLab, Ghent University-Imec, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-6793
Jan J De WaeleDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-9748
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1881020NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S59522NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G085920N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have indicated that commonly used piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) and meropenem (MEM) dosing regimens lead to suboptimal plasma concentrations for a range of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. These targets are often based on a hypothetical worst-case scenario, possibly overestimating the percentage of suboptimal concentrations. We aimed to evaluate the pathogen-based clinically relevant target attainment (CRTA) and therapeutic range attainment (TRA) of optimized continuous infusion dosing regimens of TZP and MEM in surgical ICU patients.

methodsA single center prospective observational study was conducted between March 2016 and April 2019. Free plasma concentrations were calculated by correcting total plasma concentrations, determined on remnants of blood gas samples by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, for their protein binding. Break points (BP) of identified pathogens were derived from epidemiological cut-off values. CRTA was defined as a corrected measured total serum concentration above the BP and calculated for increasing BP multiplications up to 6 × BP. The upper limit of the therapeutic range was set at 157.2 mg/L for TZP and 45 mg/L for MEM. As a worst-case scenario, a BP of 16 mg/L for TZP and 2 mg/L for MEM was used.

results781 unique patients were included with 1036 distinctive beta-lactam antimicrobial prescriptions (731 TZP, 305 MEM) for 1003 unique infections/prophylactic regimens (750 TZP, 323 MEM). 2810 samples were available (1892 TZP, 918 MEM). The median corrected plasma concentration for TZP was 86.4 mg/L [IQR 56.2-148] and 16.2 mg/L [10.2-25.5] for MEM. CRTA and TRA was consistently higher for the pathogen-based scenario than for the worst-case scenario, but nonetheless, a substantial proportion of samples did not attain commonly used PK/PD targets.

conclusionDespite these pathogen-based data demonstrating that CRTA and TRA is higher than in the often-used theoretical worst-case scenario, a substantial proportion of samples did not attain commonly used PK/PD targets when using optimised continuous infusion dosing regimens. Therefore, more dosing optimization research seems warranted. At the same time, a 'pathogen-based analysis' approach might prove to be more sensible than a worst-case scenario approach when evaluating target attainment and linked clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Continuous infusionMeropenemPiperacillin-tazobactamTherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37119362
PMCPMC10148758
OpenAlexW4367394694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.