Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119358›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

Fast screening and identification of illegal adulteration in dietary supplements and herbal medicines using molecular networking with deep-learning-based similarity algorithms.

Yanghao Sheng, Ying Xue, Jue Wang, Shao Liu, Yueping Jiang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanghao ShengDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Ying XueDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Jue WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Shao LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. liushao999@csu.edu.cn.
Yueping JiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. jiangyueping@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2022JJ80121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) is a powerful analytical tool used for adulteration inspection. Nevertheless, it is a challenging task to identify illegal adulterants that are not included in the library or are unexpected from large MS data. Molecular networking is a good tool for exploring, visualizing, and organizing MS/MS spectra, and moreover, it employs shifted peak match to calculate spectral similarity, making it capable of identifying adulteration that is not included in the library. The key of molecular networking is spectral similarity algorithms, and therefore, in this study, we compared the performance of four cutting-edge similarity algorithms, modified cosine similarity (shifted peak match), entropy similarity, and two deep-learning-based algorithms, MS2DeepScore and Spec2Vec, in building molecular networking for identification of adulteration that is not included in the library. We conducted an analysis of excluded-query-compound on all MS/MS spectra in test library and performed a large-scale false discovery rate estimation to investigate whether the spectral similarity calculated by each algorithm could represent the actual structural similarity well. The obtained results demonstrated Spec2Vec exhibited good performance in both detection capability and false discovery rate. Further comprehensive evaluation of the performance of Spec2Vec in the identification of adulteration that is not included in the library or is unexpected in different matrices and in application to real samples proved the approach studied here is a promising and powerful tool for adulterant inspection and improved the capability of analyzing large MS data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlants, MedicinalAlgorithmsDietary SupplementsPlant ExtractsTandem Mass SpectrometryPlant ExtractsAdulteration inspectionHigh-resolution mass spectrometryMolecular networkingSpectral similarity

Identifiers

PMID37119358
OpenAlexW4367368744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.