Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119089›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in cottonseed meal fed to pregnant and non-pregnant sows.

Yong Zhuo, Xiangyang Zou, Ya Wang, Xuemei Jiang, Mengmeng Sun, Shengyu Xu, Yan Lin, Lun Hua, Jian Li, Bin Feng and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nutritional values of soybean meal from different sources in multiparous sows.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong ZhuoInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Xiangyang ZouInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Ya WangInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Xuemei JiangInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Mengmeng SunInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Shengyu XuInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Yan LinInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Lun HuaInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Jian LiInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Bin FengInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-5418
Zhengfeng FangInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
Lianqiang CheInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.
De WuInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education of China and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8348-4199
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study determined the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and standard ileal digestibility (SID) of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) of six cottonseed meal (CSM) samples in pregnant and non-pregnant sows. Two CSM samples were processed by expelling with a CP level of 40.67% (ECSM41) and 44.64% (ECSM45), and four samples were processed by solvent-extracted which contained graded CP levels of 45% (SECSM45), 51.16% (SECSM51), 56.44% (SECSM56), and 59.63% (SECSM60). Landrace ×Yorkshire third parity sows, 7 at gestation and 14 non-pregnant, were fitted with T-cannula in the distal ileum. Pregnant sows were allotted to a 7 × 6 Latin square design with a cornstarch-based nitrogen-free (NF) diet and the six CSM diets, and non-pregnant sows were allotted to a replicated 7 × 3 Latin square design with seven diets and three periods, respectively, resulting in a total of six replicates per treatment. All experimental sows were fed 3.0 kg/d of the experimental diets. The AID of CP in ECSM41 (75.58%) was lower than in SECSM51 (80.42%), SECSM56 (80.50%), and SECSM60 (82.44%) diets for pregnant sows (P < 0.05). The AID of CP in ECSM41 (77.88%) was significantly lower than in SECSM60 (81.87%) diets for non-pregnant sows (P < 0.05). The physiological phase did not affect the AID of CP (P > 0.05). The SID of CP was affected by diets for both pregnant (P < 0.01) and non-pregnant sows (P = 0.06). The physiological phase also affected the SID of CP (P < 0.01). The AID of histidine, leucine, methionine, threonine, and tryptophan significantly differed between different CSM samples in both pregnant (P < 0.05) and non-pregnant sows (P < 0.05). The AID of dispensable AA aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamic acid, serine, and tyrosine differed between different CSM samples of both pregnant (P < 0.05) and non-pregnant sows (P < 0.05). For pregnant sows, the indispensable AA cysteine, glycine, proline, and tyrosine had significantly different SID between different groups (P < 0.05). For non-pregnant sows, the SID of arginine, lysine, methionine, threonine, aspartic acid, cysteine, and serine had different values among different diets (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the current study presented that the ileal AA digestibility of CSM fed to pregnant and non-pregnant sows increased with the decreased of fiber content, and the current findings can contribute to a precise formulation of diets for sows using CSM.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsCottonseed OilAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAspartic AcidCysteineDietDigestionFemaleGlycine maxIleumMethioninePregnancySerineSwineAmino AcidsAspartic AcidCottonseed OilCysteineMethionineSerineThreonineTyrosineamino acidcottonseed mealsowsstandardized ileal digestibility

Identifiers

PMID37119089
PMCPMC10199789
OpenAlexW4367368156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.