Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37119042›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2023

A systematic review with evidence mapping of supportive care interventions for melanoma patients and caregivers.

Jake R Thompson, Rehana A Salam, Sarah Hanna, Mbathio Dieng, Robyn P M Saw, Iris Bartula

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Survivorship care for melanoma patients: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Effectiveness of a stepped-care model to address fear of cancer recurrence in patients with early-stage melanoma: results at 6- and 12-month follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Patient-reported quality of life in adolescents and young adults with melanoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jake R ThompsonFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-3218
Rehana A SalamMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5423-7343
Sarah HannaDepartment of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5270-0517
Mbathio DiengNational Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6714-9633
Robyn P M SawMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3354-806X
Iris BartulaFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4084-4115
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe conducted a systematic review and evidence gap mapping to explore the existing supportive care interventions and their impact on well-being outcomes for melanoma patients and caregivers.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Index Medicus, CINAHL, Lilacs, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) and PsycINFO in December 2022, including interventional studies assessing the effectiveness of any supportive care intervention among melanoma patients and/or their caregivers.

findingsTwenty studies were included in this review. These studies consisted of randomised controlled trials (n = 11, 55%), pre-post studies (n = 7, 35%) and quasi-experimental trials (n = 2, 10%). All studies originated from high-income countries and focused primarily on melanoma patients, with no studies identified that focused solely on caregivers. Educational interventions were the most common (n = 7, 35%), followed by psychoeducational interventions (n = 6, 30%) and psychotherapeutic interventions (n = 4, 20%). Nearly all included studies (n = 18, 90%) reported a positive effect of the intervention on the primary outcome of interest; however, most studies (n = 17, 85%) were judged to be at moderate or high risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity of study designs, intervention characteristics and outcome measures, meta-analysis was not conducted. IMPLICATIONS: Supportive care interventions have positive impacts on melanoma patient well-being outcomes, while being acceptable and feasible to conduct. More research is needed regarding supportive care interventions for melanoma caregivers. Future research should focus on eliminating sources of bias through rigorous methodology, with the development of standardised outcome measures for psychosocial outcomes to facilitate future meta-analyses.

Indexed as

CaregiversMelanomaBiasHumansPsychosocial Support SystemsCaregiversEvidence Gap MapMelanomaSupportive CareSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID37119042
PMCPMC10315816
OpenAlexW4367368408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.