Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118929›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2023

Biological effects of exposure to 2650 MHz electromagnetic radiation on the behavior, learning, and memory of mice.

Rongqi Zheng, Xianxie Zhang, Yan Gao, Dawen Gao, Wenjing Gong, Chenggang Zhang, Guofu Dong, Zhihui Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rongqi ZhengLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xianxie ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing Institute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yan GaoLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dawen GaoLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenjing GongLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chenggang ZhangLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Guofu DongLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhihui LiLaboratory of Electromagnetic Biological Effects, Beijing Insititute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7042-5966
National Engineering Research Center of Electromagnetic Radiation Control Materials · CNNational Institutes of Pharmaceutical Research and Development (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of communication technology, the public is paying increasing attention to whether electromagnetic radiation is harmful to health. Mobile phone communication has entered the 5G era, and there are almost no reports on electromagnetic radiation at 2650 MHz. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the risk of adverse effects of 5G mobile phone EMR exposure on the human brain.

methodsMale animals were continuously exposed to 2650 MHz-EMR for 28 days with a whole-body averaged specific absorption rate (WBSAR) of 2.06 W/kg for 4 h per day. Mouse behavior was assessed using the open-field test (OFT), elevated-plus maze (EPM), and tail suspension test (TST). The Morris water maze (MWM), HE staining, and TUNEL staining were used to evaluate the spatial memory ability and pathological morphology of hippocampal dentate gyrus cells. Additionally, the expression levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glucocorticoid (GR) in the hippocampus were detected by western blotting and immunohistochemistry, while the corticosterone (CORT) level in serum was detected by ELISA.

resultsIn the OFT, the total distance traveled, central distance traveled, and residence time significantly decreased in the EMR exposure group (p < .05). In EPM, the percentage of the number of times to open the arm and the percentage of time to open the arm significantly decreased in the EMR exposure group. However, in the TST, the two groups had no significant difference in the 4-min immobility time. In the MWM, the escape latency of the EMR exposure group was shorter than that of the control group, with no significant difference. Furthermore, CORT levels in serum were significantly increased in the EMR exposure group (p < .05), while the expression of BDNF and GR proteins in the hippocampus was reduced (p < .05), but there was no significant difference in GABA expression.

conclusionsOur results indicate that exposure to 2650 MHz-EMR (WBSAR: 2.06 W/kg, 28 days, 4 h per day) had no significant effect on the spatial memory ability of mice (in comparison to little effect). The exposure may be associated with anxiety-like behavior in mice but not related to depression-like behavior in mice.

Indexed as

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorElectromagnetic RadiationAnimalsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHippocampusHumansMaleMiceSpatial MemoryBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factorgamma-Aminobutyric Acidanxietybrain-derived neurotrophic factorelectromagnetic radiationgamma-aminobutyric acidglucocorticoidhippocampusmemory

Identifiers

PMID37118929
PMCPMC10275548
OpenAlexW4367368716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.