ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023
Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hydration Care After Stroke: A Systematic Review of International Clinical Practice Guidelines.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Multicriteria decision analysis in the Italian healthcare context: a review of applications and methodological approaches.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Concise stakeholder-informed tool for reporting modifications to innovative surgical procedures and devices: Surgical ModificAtion Reporting Tool (SMART) checklist.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Role of General Practitioners in European Health Technology Assessment, EU-HTA Innovation in Oncology as an Example.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
- Adaptation of a clinical practice guideline for home care nursing in heart failure patients: a multi-method study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Evidence Map of Cochrane Reviews on Nutrition and Physical Activity in Healthy and At-Risk Populations: A Scoping Review.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Review
- Barriers and Facilitators to Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Bridging functional bionanomaterials and the clinic: strategic communication as a translational enabler.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Advancing knowledge translation processes in motor rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder: insights from a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a strategy developed to revise the scope of practice to recognize midwife specialists' competencies in South Africa.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- A Manifesto for Universal Healthcare: Reconstituting Primary Care Through Digital Innovation, Microbial Technologies and Empowered Citizenship.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Health extension programme unit for optimizing access to quality healthcare service in Ethiopia: a case study.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Principles and Strategies for Interest-Holder Engagement in Health Guideline Development.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Co-production of a National Botswana Tobacco Control Resource Center through Community Engagement Studio.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Methods of Engaging Interest-Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- From bedside to bench: towards clinical predictive AI research that achieves real-world impact.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- Social network analysis of stakeholders in China's hierarchical medical system: toward a collaborative governance framework for enhanced integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- How can new TB vaccines be effectively introduced in Indonesia? Insights from diverse stakeholders.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Community engagement in health guidelines and other normative products: a methodological review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Established in 2015, the Multi-Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium is an international network of over 120 individuals interested in stakeholder engagement in research and guidelines. The MuSE group is developing guidance for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guideline development. The development of this guidance has included multiple meetings with stakeholders, including patients, payers/purchasers of health services, peer review editors, policymakers, program managers, providers, principal investigators, product makers, the public, and purchasers of health services and has identified a number of key issues. These include: (1) Definitions, roles, and settings (2) Stakeholder identification and selection (3) Levels of engagement, (4) Evaluation of engagement, (5) Documentation and transparency, and (6) Conflict of interest management. In this paper, we discuss these issues and our plan to develop guidance to facilitate stakeholder engagement in all stages of the development of health and healthcare guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.