Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118688›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Drivers of child marriage in specific settings of Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia - findings from the Yes I Do! baseline study.

Maryse C Kok, Tasneem Kakal, Abeje Berhanu Kassegne, Irwan M Hidayana, Alister Munthali, J Anitha Menon, Paulo Pires, Tabither Gitau, Anke van der Kwaak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Maryse C KokKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Maryse.kok@kit.nl.
Tasneem KakalKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abeje Berhanu KassegneDepartment of Sociology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Irwan M HidayanaCenter for Gender & Sexuality Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Alister MunthaliCentre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
J Anitha MenonDepartment of Psychology, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Paulo PiresFaculdade de Ciências de Saúde, Universidade Lúrio, Nampula, Mozambique.
Tabither GitauIndependent Consultant, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anke van der KwaakKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Royal Tropical Institute · NLAddis Ababa University · ETAfrican Conservation Centre · KEAmerican University of Sharjah · AELúrio University · MZUniversity of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild marriage persists in many countries and has severe impacts on health, education, economic and social status of girls. Child marriage has many interlinked causes. This study aimed to explore the drivers of child marriage in specific contexts in Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia.

methodsThe study combined a household survey among youth (15-24 years) with focus group discussions and interviews conducted with youth (15-24 years) and parents. A variety of community stakeholders were interviewed as well. Logistic regression was done to explore associations between individual and family-level characteristics of young women and the occurrence of child marriage. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive approach. Narratives on the main drivers of child marriage across study contexts were written and inspired by the theory of normative spectrum.

resultsA lack of education was associated with the occurrence of child marriage in Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia. In all countries, teenage pregnancy was associated with child marriage. In Ethiopia, Kenya and Mozambique, fathers' education seemed a protective factor for child marriage. Narratives of study participants showed that in Ethiopia, Indonesia and (to a lesser extent) Kenya, child marriage was perceived as an 'appropriate practice' to avoid premarital sex or pregnancy, whether it involved sex with or without consent. In all countries, child marriage was driven by difficult economic circumstances, which were often intertwined with disapproved social circumstances, in particular teenage pregnancy, in case of Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. These circumstances made child marriage an 'acceptable practice'. Some youth, particularly in Indonesia, made their own choices to marry early, making child marriage a 'possible practice'.

conclusionsMultiple intersecting drivers, which were present in different degrees in each country setting, influenced the occurrence of child marriage. We found that child marriage is a manifestation of social norms, particularly related to girls' sexuality, which are intersecting with other factors at individual, social, material, and institutional level - most prominently poverty or economic constraints. Child marriage was, in some cases, a result of girls' agentic choices. Efforts to prevent child marriage need to take these realities of girls and their families into account.

Indexed as

MarriageAdolescentEthiopiaFemaleHumansIndonesiaKenyaMalawiMozambiquePregnancyYoung AdultZambiaChild marriageGenderSexualitySocial normsTeenage pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37118688
PMCPMC10141833
OpenAlexW4367302143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.