Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118650›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2023

Percutaneouse ultrasound-guided needle aspiration for management of breast abscesses - a review.

Hadeel Ghunaim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Infection Leading to Breast Abscess Formation in Pregnancy: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hadeel GhunaimTaibah University, Madina, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9036-4603
Taibah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast abscesses are still a common cause of morbidity among lactational females. Over the years, there has been an increase in the incidence of non-lactational breast abscesses and a decrease in lactational breast abscesses. The management could be the use of the conventional method of surgical incision and drainage or the newer techniques of needle aspiration or suction drain or catheter in addition to the administration of antibiotics. The use of needle aspiration as the minimal-invasive conservative technique is generally recommended for abscesses less than 3-5 cm in diameter. However, recent studies have compared the two methods for abscesses larger than 3 cm and among patients with risk factors for breast abscesses. We aim to present the clinical evidence showing the comparison between needle aspiration and incision and drainage for breast abscesses irrespective of the size of the abscesses. There is a lack of comparative information on the two treatment modalities for breast abscesses larger than 3 cm in diameter; however, needle aspiration is being tried because of its advantages like cosmetic preference, short hospital stay and healing time, and no stoppage of breastfeeding.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesMastitisAbscessBreastFemaleHumansUltrasonography, InterventionalBreast abscessincision and drainagelactationultrasound-guided aspiration

Identifiers

PMID37118650
PMCPMC10500119
OpenAlexW4367369194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.