Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118587›Full record

ReviewNature food2022

Next-generation enhanced-efficiency fertilizers for sustained food security.

Shu Kee Lam, Uta Wille, Hang-Wei Hu, Frank Caruso, Kathryn Mumford, Xia Liang, Baobao Pan, Bill Malcolm, Ute Roessner, Helen Suter and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature food, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Closing the Nutrient Loop-The New Approaches to Recovering Biomass Minerals during the Biorefinery Processes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shu Kee LamSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7943-5004
Uta WilleARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Hang-Wei HuSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3294-102X
Frank CarusoARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-497X
Kathryn MumfordARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7056-5600
Xia LiangSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6494-4885
Baobao PanSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0147-8471
Bill MalcolmSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ute RoessnerARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Helen SuterSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Geoff StevensARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5788-4682
Charlie WalkerARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Caixian TangARC Research Hub for Smart Fertilisers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-8770
Ji-Zheng HeSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-8058
Deli ChenSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. delichen@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6767-1376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen losses in agricultural systems can be reduced through enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (EEFs), which control the physicochemical release from fertilizers and biological nitrogen transformations in soils. The adoption of EEFs by farmers requires evidence of consistent performance across soils, crops and climates, paired with information on the economic advantages. Here we show that the benefits of EEFs due to avoided social costs of nitrogen pollution considerably outweigh their costs-and must be incorporated in fertilizer policies. We outline new approaches to the design of EEFs using enzyme inhibitors with modifiable chemical structures and engineered, biodegradable coatings that respond to plant rhizosphere signalling molecules.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.