Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118552›Full record

ArticleNature aging2023

Attitudes related to technology for active and healthy aging in a national multigenerational survey.

J Offerman, S Fristedt, S M Schmidt, C Lofqvist, S Iwarsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J Offerman *Department of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. jens.offerman@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-4258
S Fristedt *Department of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. sofi.fristedt@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2322-8115
S M SchmidtDepartment of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
C LofqvistDepartment of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
S IwarssonDepartment of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-7952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research is needed to understand attitudes toward and adoption of the broad range of technologies available to support active and healthy aging in different generations. The present article gives an overview of the GenerationTech survey and sample, and describes attitudes and acceptance related to technology in general and as a means to support active and healthy aging. A national survey was conducted with a random sample (n = 2,121) including men and women from three generations (30-39, 50-59 and 70-79-year-olds) in Sweden. The generations shared some attitudes toward and acceptance of technologies for active and healthy aging. However, what kind of technologies are preferred to support active and healthy aging and the reasons for using certain technologies differed by generation. The findings could help guide the development and implementation of technologies for active and healthy aging throughout the aging process.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37118552
PMCPMC10191841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.