Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118440›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2021

Radical philicity and its role in selective organic transformations.

Faeze Parsaee, Milinda C Senarathna, Prashansa B Kannangara, Shevon N Alexander, Phillip Damien E Arche, Eric R Welin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. TiOACS nanoscience Au · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Densely-functionalized bicyclic cyclopentanones by combined photoinduced 6-Organic chemistry frontiers : an international journal of organic chemistry · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radical Sampling Enabled Saturated N-Heterocycle Cyclization.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faeze ParsaeeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Milinda C SenarathnaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9359-317X
Prashansa B KannangaraDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6530-9397
Shevon N AlexanderDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-4051
Phillip Damien E ArcheDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-6439
Eric R WelinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA. ewelin@utdallas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1760-4121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical intermediates in organic chemistry lack a full octet of electrons and, thus, are commonly said to be electron deficient. By denotation, such a statement is technically correct; however, in modern literature, the term 'electron deficient' carries a connotation of electrophilicity. This lexical quirk leads one to predict that all radicals should behave as electrophiles, when this is not the case. Indeed, practitioners of radical chemistry have known for decades that many radicals behave as nucleophiles, sometimes strongly so. This Review aims to establish guidelines for understanding radical philicity by highlighting examples from recent literature as a demonstration of general reactivity paradigms across a series of different carbon-based and heteroatom-based radicals. We present strategies for predicting the philicity of a given radical on the basis of qualitative features of the radical's structure. Finally, we discuss the implications of radical philicity to selective hydrogen atom transfer.

Identifiers

PMID37118440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.