Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118134›Full record

ArticleNature aging2022

Nuclear morphology is a deep learning biomarker of cellular senescence.

Indra Heckenbach, Garik V Mkrtchyan, Michael Ben Ezra, Daniela Bakula, Jakob Sture Madsen, Malte Hasle Nielsen, Denise Oró, Brenna Osborne, Anthony J Covarrubias, M Laura Idda and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mechanical regulation of cell memory.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Indra HeckenbachCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Garik V MkrtchyanCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Ben EzraCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniela BakulaCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jakob Sture MadsenCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-7284
Malte Hasle NielsenGubra, Hørsholm, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2348-5747
Denise OróGubra, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Brenna OsborneCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-3010
Anthony J CovarrubiasDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
M Laura IddaLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Myriam GorospeLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5439-3434
Laust MortensenMethods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eric VerdinBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA.
Rudi WestendorpMethods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Scheibye-KnudsenCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. mscheibye@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6637-1280
University of Copenhagen · DKGubra (Denmark) · DKNational Institutes of Health · USBuck Institute for Research on Aging · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Senescent cell mapping, identification and validation for human somatic and reproductive tissuesU54AG075932 · NIA · BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING · PI Simon Melov, Birgit Schilling · 2021 to 2026
$12.5M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG075932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is an important factor in aging and many age-related diseases, but understanding its role in health is challenging due to the lack of exclusive or universal markers. Using neural networks, we predict senescence from the nuclear morphology of human fibroblasts with up to 95% accuracy, and investigate murine astrocytes, murine neurons, and fibroblasts with premature aging in culture. After generalizing our approach, the predictor recognizes higher rates of senescence in p21-positive and ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU)-negative nuclei in tissues and shows an increasing rate of senescent cells with age in H&E-stained murine liver tissue and human dermal biopsies. Evaluating medical records reveals that higher rates of senescent cells correspond to decreased rates of malignant neoplasms and increased rates of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, hypertension and cerebral infarction. In sum, we show that morphological alterations of the nucleus can serve as a deep learning predictor of senescence that is applicable across tissues and species and is associated with health outcomes in humans.

Indexed as

Aging, PrematureDeep LearningAgingAnimalsBiomarkersCellular SenescenceHumansMiceBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37118134
PMCPMC10154217
OpenAlexW4291793058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.