Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37118102›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2021

Exploring new targets and chemical space with affinity selection-mass spectrometry.

Renaud Prudent, D Allen Annis, Peter J Dandliker, Jean-Yves Ortholand, Didier Roche

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Direct-to-Biology Enabled Molecular Glue Discovery.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renaud PrudentEdelris, Lyon, France.
D Allen AnnisAileron Therapeutics, Inc., Watertown, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-4590
Peter J DandlikerDewpoint Therapeutics, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0055-5212
Jean-Yves OrtholandEdelris, Lyon, France.
Didier RocheEdelris, Lyon, France. didier.roche@edelris.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-6442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity selection-mass spectrometry (AS-MS) is a high-throughput screening (HTS) technique for drug discovery that enables rapid screening of large collections of compounds to identify ligands for a specific biomolecular target. AS-MS is a binding assay that is insensitive to the functional effects a ligand might have, which is important because it lets us identify novel ligands irrespective of their binding site. This approach is gaining popularity, notably due to its role in the emergence of useful agents for targeted protein degradation. This Perspective highlights the use of AS-MS techniques to explore broad chemical space and identify small-molecule ligands for biological targets that have proven challenging to address with other screening paradigms. We present chemical structures of reported AS-MS hits to illustrate the potential of this screening approach to deliver high-quality hits for further optimization. AS-MS has, thus, evolved from being an infrequent alternative to traditional HTS or DNA-encoded library strategies to now firmly establishing itself as a HTS approach for drug discovery.

Identifiers

PMID37118102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.