ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023
Abnormal Vaginal Flora in Cervical Incompetence Patients - the Impact of Escherichia coli.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on perinatalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Characteristics of vaginal microbiota in pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Characterization of Vaginal Microbial Colonization in Cervical Insufficiency Patients and Its Relation to Preterm Birth: An Observational Cohort Study.Journal of pregnancy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of abnormal vaginal colonization in women with cervical incompetence and to analyze its impact on obstetric and neonatal outcomes and placental inflammation. We included 138 pregnant women diagnosed with cervical incompetence and delivered in our hospital. Patients with major fetal anomaly or multifetal pregnancy were excluded. Upper vaginal culture was performed on the day of admission. A total of 60.9% (84/138) of cervical incompetence patients had abnormal bacterial colonization, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) was the most common colonized pathogen (33.3%, 46/138). The positive vaginal E. coli group had a higher rate of prior preterm birth (p = 0.021) and an earlier gestational age at which cervical incompetence was diagnosed (p < 0.01) than the negative group. The positive vaginal E. coli group had higher rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (p = 0.008) and subchorionic microabscess of the placenta (p = 0.012). Importantly, the positive vaginal E. coli group had significantly higher rates of proven early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) (p = 0.046), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (p = 0.001), and neonatal mortality (p = 0.023). After adjusting for confounding variables, the positive vaginal E. coli group had significantly higher risk for proven EONS (OR: 3.853, 95% CI: 1.056-14.055) and NEC (OR: 12.410, 95% CI: 1.290-119.351). In conclusion, E. coli was the most common vaginal microorganism isolated from patients with cervical incompetence. Maternal vaginal E. coli colonization was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes including proven EONS and NEC and was characterized by a higher rate of placental subchorionic microabscess.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.