Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37117846›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2023

Applications of single-cell RNA sequencing in drug discovery and development.

Bram Van de Sande, Joon Sang Lee, Euphemia Mutasa-Gottgens, Bart Naughton, Wendi Bacon, Jonathan Manning, Yong Wang, Jack Pollard, Melissa Mendez, Jon Hill and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 247 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
247citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

247 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

187 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Bram Van de Sande *UCB Pharma, Braine l'Alleud, Belgium.
Joon Sang Lee *Precision Oncology, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-6166
Euphemia Mutasa-Gottgens *EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK. effie@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-2592
Bart NaughtonComputational Neurobiology, Eisai, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-7445
Wendi BaconEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-8806
Jonathan ManningEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Yong WangPrecision Bioinformatics, Prometheus Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7183-3737
Jack PollardModerna Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Melissa MendezGenomic Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-2469
Jon HillGlobal Computational Biology and Digital Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1592-6482
Namit KumarInformatics & Predictive Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-3490
Xiaohong CaoGenomic Research Center, AbbVie Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2275-4060
Xiao ChenMagnet Biomedicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mugdha KhaladkarHuman Genetics and Computational Biology, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Ji WenOncology Research and Development Unit, Pfizer, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-5591
Andrew LeachEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-0253
Edgardo FerranEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-2486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell technologies, particularly single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) methods, together with associated computational tools and the growing availability of public data resources, are transforming drug discovery and development. New opportunities are emerging in target identification owing to improved disease understanding through cell subtyping, and highly multiplexed functional genomics screens incorporating scRNA-seq are enhancing target credentialling and prioritization. ScRNA-seq is also aiding the selection of relevant preclinical disease models and providing new insights into drug mechanisms of action. In clinical development, scRNA-seq can inform decision-making via improved biomarker identification for patient stratification and more precise monitoring of drug response and disease progression. Here, we illustrate how scRNA-seq methods are being applied in key steps in drug discovery and development, and discuss ongoing challenges for their implementation in the pharmaceutical industry.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisDrug DiscoveryGenomicsHumansRNASequence Analysis, RNARNA

Identifiers

PMID37117846
PMCPMC10141847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.