Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37117815›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2023

Prospects and challenges for nitrogen-atom transfer catalysis.

Mario N Cosio, David C Powers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Methane Catalytic Amidation via a Plausible Copper-Nitrene Intermediate.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Isolation of a Terminal Cobalt Nitride in a Metal-Organic Framework.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. P-P CouplingJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. An Open-Shell FeJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bonding and Reactivity of dJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Untangling ancillary ligand donationChemical science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mario N CosioDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
David C PowersDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. powers@chem.tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3717-2001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversion of C-H bonds to C-N bonds via C-H amination promises to streamline the synthesis of nitrogen-containing compounds. Nitrogen-group transfer (NGT) from metal nitrenes ([M]-NR complexes) has been the focus of intense research and development. By contrast, potentially complementary nitrogen-atom transfer (NAT) chemistry, in which a terminal metal nitride (an [M]-N complex) engages with a C-H bond, is underdeveloped. Although the earliest examples of stoichiometric NAT chemistry were reported 25 years ago, catalytic protocols are only now beginning to emerge. Here, we summarize the current state of the art in NAT chemistry and discuss opportunities and challenges for its development. We highlight the synthetic complementarity of NGT and NAT and discuss critical aspects of nitride electronic structure that dictate the philicity of the metal-supported nitrogen atom. We also examine the characteristic reactivity of metal nitrides and present emerging strategies and remaining obstacles to harnessing NAT for selective, catalytic nitrogenation of unfunctionalized organic small molecules.

Indexed as

MetalsNitrogenAminationCatalysisMetalsNitrogen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.