Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37117801›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Structural basis for the ligand promiscuity of the neofunctionalized, carotenoid-binding fasciclin domain protein AstaP.

Fedor D Kornilov, Yury B Slonimskiy, Daria A Lunegova, Nikita A Egorkin, Anna G Savitskaya, Sergey Yu Kleymenov, Eugene G Maksimov, Sergey A Goncharuk, Konstantin S Mineev, Nikolai N Sluchanko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review of periostin in orthopedics.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025
    Review
  3. Re-engineering of a carotenoid-binding protein based on NMR structure.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fedor D Kornilov *Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Yury B Slonimskiy *A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-3640
Daria A Lunegova *A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia.
Nikita A EgorkinA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia.
Anna G SavitskayaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey Yu KleymenovKoltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Vavilov Street, 119334, Moscow, Russia.
Eugene G MaksimovM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Biology, 119991, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6767-1501
Sergey A GoncharukShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-6462
Konstantin S MineevShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997, Moscow, Russia. konstantin.mineev@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-9421
Nikolai N SluchankoA.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia. nikolai.sluchanko@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-1416
A N Bach Institute of Biochemistry · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RUKoltzov Institute of Developmental Biology · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fasciclins (FAS1) are ancient adhesion protein domains with no common small ligand binding reported. A unique microalgal FAS1-containing astaxanthin (AXT)-binding protein (AstaP) binds a broad repertoire of carotenoids by a largely unknown mechanism. Here, we explain the ligand promiscuity of AstaP-orange1 (AstaPo1) by determining its NMR structure in complex with AXT and validating this structure by SAXS, calorimetry, optical spectroscopy and mutagenesis. α1-α2 helices of the AstaPo1 FAS1 domain embrace the carotenoid polyene like a jaw, forming a hydrophobic tunnel, too short to cap the AXT β-ionone rings and dictate specificity. AXT-contacting AstaPo1 residues exhibit different conservation in AstaPs with the tentative carotenoid-binding function and in FAS1 proteins generally, which supports the idea of AstaP neofunctionalization within green algae. Intriguingly, a cyanobacterial homolog with a similar domain structure cannot bind carotenoids under identical conditions. These structure-activity relationships provide the first step towards the sequence-based prediction of the carotenoid-binding FAS1 members.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsCell Adhesion MoleculesCarotenoidsLigandsScattering, Small AngleX-Ray DiffractionCarotenoidsCarrier ProteinsCell Adhesion MoleculesLigands

Identifiers

PMID37117801
PMCPMC10147662
OpenAlexW4367308674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.