Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37117393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Minimal requirements for ISO15189 validation and accreditation of three next generation sequencing procedures for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in clinical setting.

Céline Maschietto, Gaëtan Otto, Pauline Rouzé, Nicolas Debortoli, Benoît Bihin, Lesly Nyinkeu, Olivier Denis, Te-Din Huang, François Mullier, Pierre Bogaerts and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Céline MaschiettoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Gaëtan OttoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Pauline RouzéDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Nicolas DebortoliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Benoît BihinScientific Support Unit, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Lesly NyinkeuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Olivier DenisDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Te-Din HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
François MullierDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Pierre Bogaerts *Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Jonathan Degosserie *Department of Laboratory Medicine, UCLouvain, CHU UCL Namur, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium. jonathan.degosserie@chuuclnamur.uclouvain.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and recurrent breakthroughs of new SARS-CoV-2 strains (variants) have prompted public health authorities worldwide to set up surveillance networks to monitor the circulation of variants of concern. The use of next-generation sequencing technologies has raised the need for quality control assessment as required in clinical laboratories. The present study is the first to propose a validation guide for SARS-CoV-2 typing using three different NGS methods fulfilling ISO15189 standards. These include the assessment of the risk, specificity, accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the methods. Among the three methods used, two are amplicon-based involving reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Artic v3 and Midnight v1) on Oxford Nanopore Technologies while the third one is amplicon-based using reverse complement polymerase chain reaction (Nimagen) on Illumina technology. We found that all methods met the quality requirement (e.g., 100% concordant typing results for accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability) for SARS-CoV-2 typing in clinical setting. Additionally, the typing results emerging from each of the three sequencing methods were compared using three widely known nomenclatures (WHO, Pangolineage, and Nextclade). They were also compared regarding single nucleotide variations. The outcomes showed that Artic v3 and Nimagen should be privileged for outbreak investigation as they provide higher quality results for samples that do not meet inclusion criteria for analysis in a clinical setting. This study is a first step towards validation of laboratory developed NGS tests in the context of the new European regulation for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AccreditationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37117393
PMCPMC10140720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.