Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37117386›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2021

A comparison of RAFT and ATRP methods for controlled radical polymerization.

Nghia P Truong, Glen R Jones, Kate G E Bradford, Dominik Konkolewicz, Athina Anastasaki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Controlled Atom Transfer Radical Depolymerization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. ATRP depolymerization of lignin-derived polymethacrylates.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Polymerization from Lipid Membranes.Biomacromolecules · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Dose-Dependent, Biomechanical Recovery of Permeability Ex Vivo in GAG-Depleted Cartilage With a Synthetic Polyelectrolyte, Polystyrene Sulfonate.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Weight Control in Frontal Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nghia P Truong *Laboratory for Polymeric Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-2644
Glen R Jones *Laboratory for Polymeric Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-6073
Kate G E BradfordDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-5187
Dominik KonkolewiczDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA. d.konkolewicz@miamiOH.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-5481
Athina AnastasakiLaboratory for Polymeric Materials, Department of Materials, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. athina.anastasaki@mat.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) are the two most common controlled radical polymerization methods. Both methods afford functional polymers with a predefined length, composition, dispersity and end group. Further, RAFT and ATRP tame radicals by reversibly converting active polymeric radicals into dormant chains. However, the mechanisms by which the ATRP and RAFT methods control chain growth are distinct, so each method presents unique opportunities and challenges, depending on the desired application. This Perspective compares RAFT and ATRP by identifying their mechanistic strengths and weaknesses, and their latest synthetic applications.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.