ArticleScientific reports2023
Surgical management and clinical outcome of cervical, thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis in a middle-European adult population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current update on surgical management for spinal tuberculosis: a scientific mapping of worldwide publications.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- National Inpatient Burden, Treatment Patterns, and In-Hospital Mortality of Spinal Tuberculosis in Germany Amid Demographic Change: A Population-Based DRG Study, 2019-2025.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Deep learning radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced MRI for distinguishing between tuberculous spondylitis and pyogenic spondylitis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Identification and functional analysis of circular RNAs in intervertebral disc lesion tissues from spinal tuberculosis patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Determinants of surgical outcome in spinal tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis of 84 patients.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal tuberculosis is due to globalization no longer a disease limited to developing nations. It remains in Germany a rarity and still a difficult diagnosis. Here we analyzed patients with spinal tuberculosis treated at our neurosurgical department. According to the infected anatomic segment, patients were assigned in one of three groups. Surgery was performed when neurological deficit due to mechanical compression, deformity, instability, severe pain, necrotic bone or failure to respond to anti-tuberculous treatment were observed. We identified 34 patients with spinal tuberculosis who underwent surgical treatment. In the cervical spinal tuberculosis group, there were 15 cases (46.9%) In most cases treatment consisted of spinal instrumentation. In the thoracic group, 10 cases (29.4%) were observed. The treatment was performed by dorsolateral spinal instrumentation. For the thoracolumbar group, 9 cases (26.4%) were observed. In most cases dorsolateral spinal instrumentation was performed. One patient in the first group and one patient in the third group relapsed after operation. A second surgery was necessary. Patients with chronic back pain, immigration background and/or neurological deficit spinal TB should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Combined surgical intervention and medical treatment is associated with a favorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.