Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37117296›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2022

The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis.

Charlotte Vogt, Bert M Weckhuysen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Concluding remarks:Faraday discussions · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Scanning Photoelectrochemical (Cell) Microscopy forChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Single Cu Atom Sites on CoSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  16. Stability in the dilute limit.Nature materials · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Toward Predictive Theory in Single-Atom Catalysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte VogtInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye institute for Nanomaterials, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. C.Vogt@technion.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-3237
Bert M WeckhuysenInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye institute for Nanomaterials, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. B.M.Weckhuysen@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-1426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catalysis is at the core of chemistry and has been essential to make all the goods surrounding us, including fuels, coatings, plastics and other functional materials. In the near future, catalysis will also be an essential tool in making the shift from a fossil-fuel-based to a more renewable and circular society. To make this reality, we have to better understand the fundamental concept of the active site in catalysis. Here, we discuss the physical meaning - and deduce the validity and, therefore, usefulness - of some common approaches in heterogeneous catalysis, such as linking catalyst activity to a 'turnover frequency' and explaining catalytic performance in terms of 'structure sensitivity' or 'structure insensitivity'. Catalytic concepts from the fields of enzymatic and homogeneous catalysis are compared, ultimately realizing that the struggle that one encounters in defining the active site in most solid catalysts is likely the one we must overcome to reach our end goal: tailoring the precise functioning of the active sites with respect to many different parameters to satisfy our ever-growing needs. This article ends with an outlook of what may become feasible within the not-too-distant future with modern experimental and theoretical tools at hand.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.