ArticleScientific reports2023
Predicting drug adverse effects using a new Gastro-Intestinal Pacemaker Activity Drug Database (GIPADD).
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Impact and Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Healthcare: Systematic Review.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Building the next frontier: Artificial intelligence in 3D-printed medicines.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
- An application of deep learning model InceptionTime to predict nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation using the gastro-intestinal pacemaker activity drug database (GIPADD).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence for pharmacology research.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice.BMC medical education · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical data could be a new source of big-data for training artificial intelligence (AI) for drug discovery. A Gastro-Intestinal Pacemaker Activity Drug Database (GIPADD) was built using a standardized methodology to test drug effects on electrical gastrointestinal (GI) pacemaker activity. The current report used data obtained from 89 drugs with 4867 datasets to evaluate the potential use of the GIPADD for predicting drug adverse effects (AEs) using a machine-learning (ML) approach and to explore correlations between AEs and GI pacemaker activity. Twenty-four "electrical" features (EFs) were extracted using an automated analytical pipeline from the electrical signals recorded before and after acute drug treatment at three concentrations (or more) on four-types of GI tissues (stomach, duodenum, ileum and colon). Extracted features were normalized and merged with an online side-effect resource (SIDER) database. Sixty-six common AEs were selected. Different algorithms of classification ML models, including Naïve Bayes, discriminant analysis, classification tree, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine and an ensemble model were tested. Separated tissue models were also tested. Averaging experimental repeats and dose adjustment were performed to refine the prediction results. Random datasets were created for model validation. After model validation, nine AEs classification ML model were constructed with accuracy ranging from 67 to 80%. EF can be further grouped into 'excitatory' and 'inhibitory' types of AEs. This is the first time drugs are being clustered based on EF. Drugs acting on similar receptors share similar EF profile, indicating potential use of the database to predict drug targets too. GIPADD is a growing database, where prediction accuracy is expected to improve. The current approach provides novel insights on how EF may be used as new source of big-data in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.