ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2023
A prospective randomized multicenter trial for lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian cancer: LOVE study.
Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04710797 (A Prospective Randomized Multicentre Trial for Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Randomized Multicentre Trial for Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Ovarian Cancer
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Endometrial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- The future of gynecologic oncologic surgery: a narrative review of current surgical trials.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical analysis of the impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on the prognosis of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer (stage IA-IIA): a propensity score matching study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Multimodal Management of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Sentinel lymph nodes mapping in ovarian cancer- preliminary results from single cancer center study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Impact of lymph node staging techniques on lymphedema and quality of life in early-stage endometrial cancer: A prospective cohort study.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Ovarian Rhabdomyosarcoma in Children.Cureus · 2025Article
- Oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in borderline ovarian tumor and ovarian cancer: a retrospective comparative study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- The impact of lymph node dissection on stage I ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A US-China Comparative Analysis.iScience · 2025Article
- Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- The Role of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- Research progress in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Lymphadenectomy and optimal excise lymph nodes count for early-stage primary fallopian tube cancer: a SEER-based study.BMC women's health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms (LION) study revealed that systemic lymphadenectomy did not bring survival benefit for advanced ovarian cancer patients with clinically normal lymph nodes and was associated with a higher incidence of operative complications. However, there is no consensus on whether lymphadenectomy has survival benefit or not in early epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
methodsWe designed the LOVE study, a multicenter, randomized controlled, phase III trial to compare the efficacy and safety of comprehensive staging surgery with or without lymphadenectomy in stages IA-IIB EOC and fallopian tube carcinomas (FTC). The hypothesis is that the oncological outcomes provided by comprehensive staging surgery without lymphadenectomy are non-inferior to those of conventional completion staging surgery in early-stage EOC and FTC patients who have indications for post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients assigned to experimental group will undergo comprehensive staging surgery, but lymphadenectomy. Patients assigned to comparative group will undergo completion staging surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. All subjects will receive 3-6 cycles of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Major inclusion criteria are pathologic confirmed stage IA-IIB EOC or FTC, and patients have indications for adjuvant chemotherapy either confirmed by intraoperative fast frozen section or previous pathology after an incomplete staging surgery. Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial tumors and low-grade serous carcinoma. Patients with severe rectum involvement which lead to partial rectum resection will be excluded. The sample size is 656 subjects. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04710797.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.