ReviewGlobal health, science and practice2023
Addressing the Need for a Preexposure Prophylaxis Monitoring and Evaluation Implementation Guide: Experience From Zambia.
Review in Global health, science and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis among the University of Zambia students: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Programme science in action: lessons from an observational study of HIV prevention programming for key populations in Lusaka, Zambia.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Observational
- Barriers and facilitators to uptake and persistence on prep among key populations in Southern Province, Zambia: a thematic analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Lessons learnt from daily oral PrEP delivery to inform national planning for PrEP ring introduction for women in low-income and middle-income countries: a qualitative inquiry of international stakeholders.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in South Africa: a case study of USAID-supported programs.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe HIV care continuum comprises well-defined steps and indicators. In contrast, indicators along the preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) cascade are still in the early stages of implementation. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of PrEP services is critical to optimizing PrEP uptake and adherence during periods of HIV risk. We provide an overview of global indicators for PrEP, describe the development process and outcomes of Zambia's 2022 NATIONAL M&E GUIDE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: During the scale-up of PrEP, the Zambia Ministry of Health (MOH) and the National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council recognized the need for a national unified monitoring system to guide the effective implementation of PrEP services. Stakeholders from the MOH, civil society, professional organizations, funding agencies, and implementing partners developed the
conclusionsUsing a collaborative and consensus-based approach, Zambia developed its first national PrEP M&E implementation guide to provide standardized guidelines for optimizing the delivery, monitoring, and evaluation of PrEP service delivery. Zambia's experience can inform other countries in sub-Saharan Africa as they develop national M&E implementation approaches for PrEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.