Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37116936›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2023

How Poor Is Your Sample? A Simple Approach for Estimating the Relative Economic Status of Small and Nonrepresentative Samples.

Jan Ostermann, Nicole Hair, Volker Grzimek, Siyu Zheng, Wenfeng Gong, Kathryn Whetten, Nathan Thielman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan OstermannUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nicole HairUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Volker GrzimekBerea College, Berea, KY, USA.
Siyu ZhengUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Wenfeng GongJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathryn WhettenDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nathan ThielmanDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

HIV/AIDS and Orphan CareR01HD046345 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WHETTEN, KATHRYN · 2005 to 2014
$5.2M
Does preference-based HIV testing increase uptake in high risk populations?R01MH106388 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI OSTERMANN, JAN, THIELMAN, NATHAN M · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046345NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsset-based indices of living standards, or wealth indices, are widely used proxies for economic status; however, such indices are not readily available for small and nonrepresentative samples.

methodsWe describe a simple out-of-sample prediction approach that uses estimates from large and representative "reference" samples to calculate measures of relative economic status (e.g., wealth index scores) for small and/or nonrepresentative "target" samples. The method relies on the availability of common variables and assumptions about comparable associations between these variables and the underlying construct of interest (e.g., household wealth). We provide 2 sample applications that use Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 5 countries as reference samples. Using ordinary least squares regression, we estimate associations between household characteristics and the DHS wealth index. We use parameter estimates to predict wealth index scores for small nonrepresentative target samples. Comparisons of wealth distributions in the reference and target samples highlight selection effects.

resultsApplications of the approach to diverse populations, including populations at high risk of HIV infection and households with orphaned and separated children, demonstrate its usefulness for characterizing the economic status of small and nonrepresentative samples relative to existing reference samples. Women and men in northern Tanzania at high risk of HIV infection were concentrated in the upper half of the wealth distribution. By contrast, the relative distribution of household wealth among households with orphaned and separated children varied greatly across countries and rural versus urban settings.

conclusionsPublic health professionals who implement, manage, and evaluate programs in low- and middle-income countries may find this approach applicable because of the simplicity of the estimation methods, low marginal cost of primary data acquisition, and availability of established measures of relative economic status in many publicly available household surveys (e.g., those administered by the DHS Program, World Bank, International Labour Organization, and UNICEF).

Indexed as

Economic StatusHIV InfectionsChildFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleRural PopulationSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID37116936
PMCPMC10141430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.