ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023
Precisely timed regulation of enhancer activity defines the binary expression pattern of Fushi tarazu in the Drosophila embryo.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compensatory action of different types of cis-regulatory elements buffers the striped expression of Drosophila pair-rule genes.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Single Molecule View of Transcriptional Dynamics in Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Active Nuclei DuringInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Coordinated active repression operates via transcription factor cooperativity and multiple inactive promoter states in a developing organism.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cell fate ratios are encoded by transcriptional dynamics in the Drosophila retina.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Recent approaches lead to a deeper understanding of diverse segmentation mechanisms in insects, with a focus on the pair-rule genes.Current opinion in insect science · 2025Review
- A space for time. Exploring temporal regulation of plant development across spatial scales.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Dynamic microenvironments shape nuclear organization and gene expression.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Opticool: Cutting-edge transgenic optical tools.PLoS genetics · 2024Review
- Time will tell: comparing timescales to gain insight into transcriptional bursting.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2024Review
- The ftz upstream element drives late ftz stripes but is not required for regulation of Ftz target genes.Developmental biology · 2024Article
- Clearing the slate: RNA turnover to enable cell state switching?Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Dynamics of an incoherent feedforward loop drive ERK-dependent pattern formation in the early Drosophila embryo.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genes that drive development each typically have many different enhancers. Properly coordinating the action of these different enhancers is crucial to correctly specifying cell-fate decisions, yet it remains poorly understood how their activity is choregraphed in time. To shed light on this question, we used recently developed single-cell live imaging tools to dissect the regulation of Fushi tarazu (Ftz) in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Ftz is a transcription factor that is expressed in asymmetric stripes by two distinct enhancers: autoregulatory and zebra. The anterior edge of each stripe needs to be sharply defined to specify essential lineage boundaries. Here, we tracked how boundary cells commit to either a high-Ftz or low-Ftz fate by measuring Ftz protein traces in real time and simultaneously quantifying transcription from the endogenous locus and individual enhancers. This revealed that the autoregulatory enhancer does not establish this fate choice. Instead, it perpetuates the decision defined by zebra. This is contrary to the prevailing view that autoregulation drives the fate decision by causing bi-stable Ftz expression. Furthermore, we showed that the autoregulatory enhancer is not activated based on a Ftz-concentration threshold but through a timing-based mechanism. We hypothesize that this is regulated by several ubiquitously expressed pioneer-like transcription factors, which have recently been shown to act as timers in the embryo. Our work provides new insight into how precisely timed enhancer activity can directly regulate the dynamics of gene regulatory networks, which may be a general mechanism for ensuring that embryogenesis runs like clockwork.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.