Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37116167›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Prediction and Detection of Cervical Malignancy Using Machine Learning Models.

Seeta Devi, Sachin Ramnath Gaikwad, Harikrishnan R

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in artificial intelligence for the early detection of cervical cancer in adult women: a scoping review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seeta DeviSymbiosis College of Nursing (SCON), Symbiosis International Deemed University (SIDU), Pune- 412115, India.
Sachin Ramnath GaikwadSymbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International Deemed University (SIDU), Pune- 412115, India.
Harikrishnan RSymbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International Deemed University (SIDU), Pune- 412115, India.
Symbiosis International University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHuman papillomavirus and other predicting factors are responsible causing cervical cancer, and early prediction and diagnosis is the solution for preventing this condition.  The objective is to find out and analyze the predictors of cervical cancer and to study the issues of unbalanced datasets using various Machine Learning (ML) algorithm-based models.

methodsA multi-stage sampling strategy was used to recruit 501 samples for the study. The educational intervention was the video-assisted counseling which is consisted of two educational methods: a documentary film and face-to- face interaction with women followed by reminders. Following the collection of baseline data from these subjects, they were encouraged to undergo Pap smear screening. Women having abnormal Pap tests were sent for biopsy. Machine learning classification methods such as Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) and Naive Bayes(NB) were used to evaluate the unbalanced input and target datasets.

resultMerely 398 women out of 501 showed an interest to participate in the study, but only 298 stated a willingness for cervical screening. Atypical malignant cells were discovered on the cervix of 26 women who had abnormal pap tests. These women had guided for further tests, such as a cervical biopsy, and seven women had been diagnosed with cervical cancer. LR in models 1, 2, and 4 showed 88% to 94% sensitivity with 84% to 89% accuracy, respectively for cervical cancer prediction, whereas DT in models 3, 5, and 6 algorithms exhibited 83% to 84% sensitivity with 84% to 88% accuracy, respectively. The NB and LR algorithms produced the highest area under the ROC curve for testing dataset, but all models performed similarly for training data.

conclusionIn current study , Logistic Regression and Decision Tree algorithms were identified as the best-performed ML algorithm classifiers to detect the significant predictors.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMachine LearningCervical MalignancyCervical screeningMachine Learning AlgorithmspredictionPrediction and Detection

Identifiers

PMID37116167
PMCPMC10352741
OpenAlexW4367307511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.