ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
Comparative Study of DNA ploidy and BRAF Immunohistochemistry between Colonic Adenocarcinoma and Inflammatory Colonic Lesions.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) in non-Lynch colonic adenocarcinoma, ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn disease (CD) which are known as risk factors, and colitis. We correlated ploidy and SPF with tumor grading, staging and BRAF expression.
methodsAll studied adenocarcinomas have intact mismatch repair genes as proved by immunohistochemistry. All were assessed for ploidy by automated image-based DNA cytometry and histograms were drawn. Immunostaining by anti-BRAF V600E was performed. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) was done as a preliminary step for staging GI cancers.
resultsthere is significant difference in DNA ploidy between groups; 77.5% and 17.5% of aneuploid cases are adenocarcinoma and UC. Groups are compared in terms of 2C, 4C, above 4C DNA content and SPF and significant difference is principally found between adenocarcinoma group and others. In adenocarcinomas, DNA ploidy is significantly correlated with tumor staging and grading. Regarding BRAF expression, there is significant difference between groups; all adenocarcinomas, 83.33% of UC were positive, while all cases of colitis, bilharzial colitis, CD were negative. There is significant relation between BRAF and SPF among all diploid cases including adenocarcinoma, and among non-neoplastic diploid cases. There is direct significant relation between BRAF intensity and adenocarcinoma staging. There is no significant difference between BRAF and ploidy among UC cases, although 75% of aneuploid UC are positive. DL helps in GI cancer staging. Routine laparoscopy before laparotomy, especially in cancers which have equivocal operability helps to avoid unnecessary laparotomies.
conclusionBased on significant difference in ploidy between adenocarcinoma and UC and between SPF and ploidy, assessment of ploidy by DNA cytometry for UC and other colitis could therefore predict impending malignant transformation before development of colonic dysplasia. Also measuring SPF in adenocarcinoma helps to select patients who could greatly benefit from chemotherapy. DL has vital role in staging GI cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.