Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37116141›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using EQ-5D-5L: Value Set Derived for Indian Breast Cancer Cohort.

Tabassum Wadasadawala, Sanjay K Mohanty, Soumendu Sen, Pijush Kanti Khan, Sharmila Pimple, Jaykumar V Mane, Rajiv Sarin, Sudeep Gupta, Vani Parmar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health related quality of life of patients with breast cancer in Malaysia: evidence from EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tabassum WadasadawalaAdvanced Center for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Sanjay K MohantyInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9041-5952
Soumendu SenInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3114-3712
Pijush Kanti KhanInternational Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2118-3945
Sharmila PimpleTata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jaykumar V ManeTata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Rajiv SarinTata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000000264058282
Sudeep GuptaTata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vani ParmarTata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INInternational Institute for Population Sciences · INInternational Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to report quality of life of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from India in a large cohort using the EQ-5D-5L instrument.

methodsThe study used longitudinal data of 500 breast cancer and 200 non-cancer subjects registered at our centre, during June 2019 and March 2022. The EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS instruments were used to measure and compare utility scores among cancer and non-cancer subjects. Descriptive statistics were analyzed and Tobit regression model were used to confirm the predictors of the utility score.

resultsThe cancer subjects had a mean EQ-ED-5L utility score of 0.8703 (SD=0.121), 0.8745 (SD=0.094) and 0.8902 (SD=0.107) at the time of baseline, completion and follow up surveys respectively.  EQ-5D-5L values had significantly worsened after diagnosis of cancer as compared to the non-cancer cohort (0.87 vs. 0.93, p value 0.000). EQ-5D-5L utility scores as per stage for the cancer cohort were 0.88, 0.86 and 0.83 respectively for stage I-II, III and IV. Similarly, the EQ-VAS scores for stage I-II, III and IV were 74.9, 72.6 and 73.2 respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed strong association of age, religion and income with the utility-values.

conclusionThis is the first longitudinal study reporting the utility scores derived from a large cohort of breast cancer patients demonstrating lower utility scores compared to non-cancer cohort. The utility scores also improve post treatment completion for cancer patients and decrease with higher stage at diagnosis. This information will be useful for future health economic research in India pertaining to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeFemaleHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnairesbreast cancerEQ-5D-5LHealth State UtilityIndiaQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37116141
PMCPMC10352737
OpenAlexW4367307047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.