ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
Disparities in Compliance with Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence from Two US National Surveys.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Race, Ethnicity, and Sex With Colorectal Cancer Screening Use Among US Adults With and Without Self-Reported Depressive Disorders, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2022.Preventing chronic disease · 2026Article
- When Should Colon Cancer Screening Begin? The Impact of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and the Reality of an Unscreened Older Population.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) is the most preventable cancer if adherence to its screening guidelines through compliance with physician recommendations are met. Lack of access to care is the most significant barrier which was decreased by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), that may influence healthcare behaviors/practices. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting compliance with recommendations for CRC screening between two US National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) in 2010 and 2015.
methodsWe used individual data of adults aged ≥50 years from the Cancer Module of NHIS that repeats every-5-years. Multiple logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the compliance associated factors and their changes after five years.
resultsWe included final data of 1,553 and 2259 and individual from 2010 and 2015, respectively. Overall, compliance to physician recommendations for colorectal cancer was 85.70% in 2010 and 81.54%. Men compiled more in 2010 than women which was reversed in 2015. The multivariable-adjusted odds of compliance were increased with age; lower for female [Odds ratio (OR)= 0.45 Confidence Interval (CI 95% 0.27, 0.75), having a family history of CRC [OR=3.05 CI:1.02, 9.05], having insurance [OR 3.58 CI:1.4, 9.12], and Odds increased with the number of doctor visit in 2010. However, in 2015 the odds were substantially increased with the increasing age, reversed odds for female [OR= 3.49 CI: 1.67, 7.29)], increased for non-Hispanic Blacks [OR= 4.87 CI: 2.05, 11.55] and lower for Asian [OR=0.33 CI:0.15, 0.74], higher for family history of colorectal cancer [OR=3.31 CI:1.92, 5.69]. Although insurance coverage and the number of doctor visits were significant predictors of compliance in 2010, those became non-significant in 2015.
conclusionsCompliance disparities by gender and access to healthcare either reduced in strength or reversed between 2010 and 2015. The non-Hispanic Black significantly higher in compliance than other race-ethnicities in 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.