Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115771›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Healthcare professionals' views on implementing the STAR care pathway for people with chronic pain after total knee replacement: A qualitative study.

Andrew J Moore, Vikki Wylde, Wendy Bertram, Andrew D Beswick, Nick Howells, Rachael Gooberman-Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J MooreMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3185-1599
Vikki WyldeMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Wendy BertramMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Andrew D BeswickMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7032-7514
Nick HowellsNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rachael Gooberman-HillMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many people with advanced osteoarthritis, total knee replacement is an effective treatment to relieve pain and improve function. However, 10-34% of people experience chronic postsurgical pain in the months and years after total knee replacement. The Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) randomised controlled trial (ISCRTN92545361) evaluated the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a new multifaceted and personalised care pathway, compared with usual care, for people with pain at three months after total knee replacement. Our objective was to identify factors promoting or inhibiting its implementation, and to inform future training and wider implementation of the pathway. We conducted a prospective process evaluation using qualitative interviews with eight Extended Scope Practitioners and six Principal Investigators from seven trial sites who were involved in delivering the STAR care pathway during the trial. We used Normalization Process Theory as a theoretical framework for qualitative data collection and content analysis. We identified that factors promoting the implementation of the pathway were quick familiarisation with the pathway, valuing patient-centredness, formalising referral processes, and increasing confidence to address neuropathic pain. Challenges to implementation were availability of time and resources, sensitivity in referral process, and ensuring collective understanding of the pathway. These findings have enabled us to make recommendations about the future implementation of the STAR care pathway and will inform the development of a training package, and updated manual for successful delivery in usual care. Furthermore, this model of care has potential value in diverse elective surgeries and pain conditions.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChronic PainCritical PathwaysDelivery of Health CareHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37115771
PMCPMC10146502
OpenAlexW4367309385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.