Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115763›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

The representational hierarchy in human and artificial visual systems in the presence of object-scene regularities.

Stefania Bracci, Jakob Mraz, Astrid Zeman, Gaëlle Leys, Hans Op de Beeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Synthesizing images to map neural networks to the human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefania BracciCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1435-2536
Jakob MrazBrain & Cognition Research Unit, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Astrid ZemanBrain & Cognition Research Unit, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gaëlle LeysBrain & Cognition Research Unit, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans Op de BeeckBrain & Cognition Research Unit, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human vision is still largely unexplained. Computer vision made impressive progress on this front, but it is still unclear to which extent artificial neural networks approximate human object vision at the behavioral and neural levels. Here, we investigated whether machine object vision mimics the representational hierarchy of human object vision with an experimental design that allows testing within-domain representations for animals and scenes, as well as across-domain representations reflecting their real-world contextual regularities such as animal-scene pairs that often co-occur in the visual environment. We found that DCNNs trained in object recognition acquire representations, in their late processing stage, that closely capture human conceptual judgements about the co-occurrence of animals and their typical scenes. Likewise, the DCNNs representational hierarchy shows surprising similarities with the representational transformations emerging in domain-specific ventrotemporal areas up to domain-general frontoparietal areas. Despite these remarkable similarities, the underlying information processing differs. The ability of neural networks to learn a human-like high-level conceptual representation of object-scene co-occurrence depends upon the amount of object-scene co-occurrence present in the image set thus highlighting the fundamental role of training history. Further, although mid/high-level DCNN layers represent the category division for animals and scenes as observed in VTC, its information content shows reduced domain-specific representational richness. To conclude, by testing within- and between-domain selectivity while manipulating contextual regularities we reveal unknown similarities and differences in the information processing strategies employed by human and artificial visual systems.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID37115763
PMCPMC10171658
OpenAlexW4367309333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.