ArticleJAMA network open2023
Assessment of Surrogate End Point Trends in Clinical Trials to Approve Oncology Drugs From 2001 to 2020 in Japan.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pathologic Complete Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Post-Marketing Requirements for Anticancer Drugs Approved in Japan, 2001-2024: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Beyond Indication Expansion: Aligning Evidence, Reimbursement, and Access in Multi-Indication Oncology Drugs [Letter].Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Surrogate Endpoints in Pivotal Clinical Trials for Drug Approval in Japan Compared to the United States.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Surrogate Biomarkers in Gene Therapy for Orphan Diseases: Validation, Application, and Regulatory Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Regulatory Disparities Between US Accelerated Approval and Japanese Authorization of Oncology Drugs: An Analysis of Evidence Quality.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Consideration on Food Effect Studies for Anticancer Drugs Approved in Japan Between 2001 and 2022.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Cancer Drugs Approved Based on Surrogate Endpoint: A Retrospective Observational Study in the United States and China.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- Frequently asked questions on surrogate endpoints in oncology-opportunities, pitfalls, and the way forward.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Towards replicability and sustainability in cancer research.BJC reports · 2024Review
- Continued cancer drug approvals in Japan and Europe after market withdrawal in the United States: A comparative study of accelerated approvals.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Trends in oncology drug lags in Japan from 2001 to 2020: A cross-sectional study.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: A surrogate end point (SEP) is an end point used in clinical trials as an alternative for measuring the true clinical benefit. The use of SEPs in trials shortens their duration. Objectives: To investigate the use of SEPs in clinical trials to support the approval of anticancer drugs and to determine whether confirmatory studies that use overall survival (OS) as an end point are being conducted in Japan. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, drug approvals and background information were obtained from publicly available information, such as the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency website, for anticancer drugs approved in Japan from January 2001 to December 2020. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to March 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Characteristics of approved oncology drugs in Japan, end points for pivotal clinical trials, and outcomes of confirmatory trials using OS as an end point following drug approval. Results: There were 299 anticancer drugs approved in Japan during the study period. Of these, 142 (47.5%) were molecular-targeted drugs, the most common of which targeted non-small cell lung cancer. There were 111 (37.1%) anticancer drugs with orphan designation. From 2001 to 2005, OS was used as an end point in 1 approval (3.6%); however, from 2006 to 2020, OS was used in 86 approvals (31.7%). Of the 212 anticancer drugs approved on the basis of SEPs, confirmatory studies with OS as the end point were conducted for only 37 approvals (17.5%); for the remaining 175 approvals, studies are under way for 35 approvals (16.5%), were waivered for 75 approvals (35.4%), and were not conducted for 65 approvals (30.7%). Furthermore, in 20 drug approvals (9.4%), the conducted confirmatory studies were not effective in determining the OS, but the drugs were approved following re-examination. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that starting from 2005, the use of OS as an end point has increased in studies supporting the approval of anticancer drugs in Japan. However, even after 2005, approximately two-thirds of these approvals were SEP based. Postmarketing surveillance studies of the true end points are necessary to validate the use of SEPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.