Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115550›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Assessment of Surrogate End Point Trends in Clinical Trials to Approve Oncology Drugs From 2001 to 2020 in Japan.

Hideki Maeda, Riko Shingai, Kentaro Takeda, Asuka Hara, Yuna Murai, Momoka Ofuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hideki MaedaDepartment of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio, Kiyose-city, Tokyo, Japan.
Riko ShingaiDepartment of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio, Kiyose-city, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro TakedaData Science, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc, Northbrook, Illinois.
Asuka HaraDepartment of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio, Kiyose-city, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuna MuraiDepartment of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio, Kiyose-city, Tokyo, Japan.
Momoka OfuchiDepartment of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio, Kiyose-city, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A surrogate end point (SEP) is an end point used in clinical trials as an alternative for measuring the true clinical benefit. The use of SEPs in trials shortens their duration. Objectives: To investigate the use of SEPs in clinical trials to support the approval of anticancer drugs and to determine whether confirmatory studies that use overall survival (OS) as an end point are being conducted in Japan. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, drug approvals and background information were obtained from publicly available information, such as the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency website, for anticancer drugs approved in Japan from January 2001 to December 2020. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to March 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Characteristics of approved oncology drugs in Japan, end points for pivotal clinical trials, and outcomes of confirmatory trials using OS as an end point following drug approval. Results: There were 299 anticancer drugs approved in Japan during the study period. Of these, 142 (47.5%) were molecular-targeted drugs, the most common of which targeted non-small cell lung cancer. There were 111 (37.1%) anticancer drugs with orphan designation. From 2001 to 2005, OS was used as an end point in 1 approval (3.6%); however, from 2006 to 2020, OS was used in 86 approvals (31.7%). Of the 212 anticancer drugs approved on the basis of SEPs, confirmatory studies with OS as the end point were conducted for only 37 approvals (17.5%); for the remaining 175 approvals, studies are under way for 35 approvals (16.5%), were waivered for 75 approvals (35.4%), and were not conducted for 65 approvals (30.7%). Furthermore, in 20 drug approvals (9.4%), the conducted confirmatory studies were not effective in determining the OS, but the drugs were approved following re-examination. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that starting from 2005, the use of OS as an end point has increased in studies supporting the approval of anticancer drugs in Japan. However, even after 2005, approximately two-thirds of these approvals were SEP based. Postmarketing surveillance studies of the true end points are necessary to validate the use of SEPs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJapanPharmaceutical PreparationsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID37115550
PMCPMC10148198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.