ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Distribution of 50-layer corneal densitometry values and related factors.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linking layered corneal compactness to macroscopic biomechanics:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Age-Related Trends in Corneal Refractive Parameters: A Fourier Analysis of Videokeratography in Healthy Eyes.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of corneal optical densitometry in keratoconus.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the distribution of 50 layers of corneal densitometry and related factors.
methodsClinical data, including age, sex, central corneal thickness, corneal keratometry, and diopters, were collected from 102 healthy participants (102 eyes) in this retrospective study. The cornea was divided into 50 layers, and densitometry of each layer at 19 points was measured by the Pentacam. The value versus the depth curve was plotted. Paired-sample t test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare densitometry in different regions or depth. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.
resultsThe densitometry values of the Bowman membrane (10-14% depth), anterior stroma (14-30% depth), epithelium (0-10% depth), and Descemet membrane (94-98% depth) decreased sequentially, and the densitometry values of the middle and posterior stroma (30-94% depth) and endothelium (98-100% depth) were the lowest. The higher the degree of astigmatism, the higher the second densitometry peak (R = 0.277, P < .001). The densitometry values of the vertex and superior parts of the cornea were higher than those in the periphery and inferior parts, respectively (all P < .001). In the Bowman membrane, the densitometry is lowest in the inferior nasal part, while in the Descemet membrane, it is lowest in the inferior temporal part.
conclusionTwo densitometry peaks appeared near the Bowman membrane and Descemet membrane. For different depths, the distribution of densitometry within a layer is different. We provide a methodological reference and data basis for corneal research based on local changes in densitometry, and help understand the details of corneal structure from an optical perspective through detailed layering and zoning analysis of densitometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.