Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115419›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2023

Predicting the probability of good neurological outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest based on prearrest factors: validation of the good outcome following attempted resuscitation 2 (GO-FAR 2) score.

Boram Kim, Seok-In Hong, Youn-Jung Kim, Yeon Joo Cho, Won Young Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boram KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Seok-In HongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Youn-Jung KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Yeon Joo ChoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Won Young KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea. wonpia73@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-6552

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) 2 score is a prognostic tool developed to support decision-making for do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders by predicting neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) based on prearrest variables. However, this scoring system requires further validation. We aimed to validate the GO-FAR 2 score for predicting good neurological outcome in Korean patients with IHCA. A single-centre registry of adult patients with IHCA from 2013 to 2017 was analysed. The primary outcome was discharge with good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2). The patients were divided into four categories according to the GO-FAR 2 score: very poor (≥ 5), poor (2-4), average (- 3 to 1), and above-average (< - 3) likelihood of good neurological outcome. Of 1,011 patients (median age, 65 years), 63.1% were men. The rate of good neurological outcome was 16.0%. The proportions of patients categorised as having very poor, poor, average, and above-average probability of good neurological outcome were 3.9%, 18.3%, 70.2%, and 7.6%, respectively. In each category, good neurological outcome was observed in 0%, 1.1%, 16.8%, and 53.2%, respectively. Among patients in below-average categories (very poor + poor, GO-FAR 2 score ≥ 2), only 0.9% had good outcome. GO-FAR 2 score ≥ 2 showed a sensitivity of 98.8% and a negative predictive value of 99.1% in predicting good neurological outcome. The GO-FAR 2 score can predict neurological outcome after IHCA. In particular, GO-FAR 2 score ≥ 2 may support decision-making for DNAR orders.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestAdultAgedFemaleHospitalsHumansMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesAsianCardiopulmonary resuscitationGO-FARIn-hospital cardiac arrestValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.