Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115391›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Utility of detection of breast calcifications with integrated real-time radiography system (IRRS) during digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-guided vacuum assisted biopsy (VAB): initial single-center experience.

Emilia Giambersio, Catherine Depretto, Rubina Manuela Trimboli, Giovanni Di Leo, Elisa D'Ascoli, Gianmarco Della Pepa, Giovanni Irmici, Lidia Rabiolo, Gianfranco Paride Scaperrotta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia GiambersioPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. emilia.giambersio@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-4067
Catherine DeprettoBreast Imaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Rubina Manuela TrimboliIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Di LeoRadiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese (Milan), Italy.
Elisa D'AscoliPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Gianmarco Della PepaPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni IrmiciPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi Di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Lidia RabioloSection of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Gianfranco Paride ScaperrottaBreast Imaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the presence of calcifications in specimens collected during stereotactic-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (VABB) is sufficient to ascertain their adequacy for final diagnosis at pathology. MATERIALS AND

methodsDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-guided VABBs were performed on 74 patients with calcifications as target. Each biopsy consisted of the collection of 12 samplings with a 9-gauge needle. This technique was integrated with a real-time radiography system (IRRS) which allowed the operator to determine whether calcifications were included in the specimens at the end of each of the 12 tissue collections through the acquisition of a radiograph of every sampling. Calcified and non-calcified specimens were separately sent to pathology and evaluated.

resultsA total of 888 specimens were retrieved, 471 containing calcifications and 417 without. In 105 (22.2%) samples out of 471 with calcifications cancer was detected, while the remaining 366 (77.7%) were non-cancerous. Out of 417 specimens without calcifications 56 (13.4%) were cancerous, whereas 361 (86.5%) were non-cancerous. Seven hundred and twenty-seven specimens out of all 888 were cancer-free (81.8%, 95%CI 79-84%).

conclusionAlthough there is a statistical significative difference between calcified and non-calcified samples and the detection of cancer (p < 0.001), our study shows that the sole presence of calcifications in the specimens is not sufficient to determine their adequacy for final diagnosis at pathology because non-calcified samples can be cancerous and vice-versa. Ending biopsies when calcifications are first detected through IRRS could lead to false negative results.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisBiopsyBiopsy, NeedleBreastFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMammographyRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerDCISMicro-calcificationsStereotacticVABB

Identifiers

PMID37115391
OpenAlexW4367318080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.