ReviewNano convergence2023
Understanding the 2D-material and substrate interaction during epitaxial growth towards successful remote epitaxy: a review.
Review in Nano convergence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Porous-lift-off germanium membranes as lightweight, flexible, and cost-effective template for III-V space solar cells: a review.Communications engineering · 2026Review
- Development of a ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for the Crystallization of van der Waals-Layered Bismuth Selenide.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026Article
- Li-ion transport in two-dimensional nanofluidic membranes.Nano convergence · 2024Review
- Advancements and Challenges in the Integration of Indium Arsenide and Van der Waals Heterostructures.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Review
- Emergence of two distinct phase transitions in monolayer CoSeNano convergence · 2024Article
- Unveiling the mechanism of remote epitaxy of crystalline semiconductors on 2D materials-coated substrates.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Determination of the preferred epitaxy for III-nitride semiconductors on wet-transferred graphene.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remote epitaxy, which was discovered and reported in 2017, has seen a surge of interest in recent years. Although the technology seemed to be difficult to reproduce by other labs at first, remote epitaxy has come a long way and many groups are able to consistently reproduce the results with a wide range of material systems including III-V, III-N, wide band-gap semiconductors, complex-oxides, and even elementary semiconductors such as Ge. As with any nascent technology, there are critical parameters which must be carefully studied and understood to allow wide-spread adoption of the new technology. For remote epitaxy, the critical parameters are the (1) quality of two-dimensional (2D) materials, (2) transfer or growth of 2D materials on the substrate, (3) epitaxial growth method and condition. In this review, we will give an in-depth overview of the different types of 2D materials used for remote epitaxy reported thus far, and the importance of the growth and transfer method used for the 2D materials. Then, we will introduce the various growth methods for remote epitaxy and highlight the important points in growth condition for each growth method that enables successful epitaxial growth on 2D-coated single-crystalline substrates. We hope this review will give a focused overview of the 2D-material and substrate interaction at the sample preparation stage for remote epitaxy and during growth, which have not been covered in any other review to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.