ReviewPituitary2023
Advances in surgical approaches for refractory pituitary adenomas.
Review in Pituitary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reported baseline variables in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma over a 30 year period: a systematic review.Pituitary · 2023Pooled it
- Endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent or residual pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Region-Resolved Integrative Multi-Omic Characterization Reveals Diverse Tumor and Microenvironment Features of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Impact of Intraoperative MRI on Outcomes in Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Everolimus in pituitary tumor: a review of preclinical and clinical evidence.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Refractory pituitary adenomas are difficult to control tumors that progress through optimal surgical, medical, and radiation management. Repeat surgery is a valuable tool to reduce tumor volume for more effective radiation and/or medical therapy, and to decompress critical neurovascular structures. Advances in surgical techniques and technologies, including minimally invasive cranial approaches, intraoperative MRI suites, and cranial nerve monitoring, have improved surgical outcomes and expanded indications. Today, repeat transsphenoidal surgery has similar complications rates to upfront surgery in historical cohorts. The decision to operate on refractory adenomas should be made with multidisciplinary teams, balancing the benefit of tumor reduction with the potential for complications, including cranial nerve injury, carotid injury, and cerebrospinal fluid leak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.