Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115267›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Semiautomatic assessment of endothelial density and morphology in organ-cultured corneas - potential predictors for transplantation suitability and clinical outcome?

Filip Filev, Mathias Stein, Maximilian Schultheiss, Antonia D E Fitzek, Jana Feuerstake, Oliver Engel, Olaf J C Hellwinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Filip FilevDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martitistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. flip_flev@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-0079
Mathias SteinDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martitistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Maximilian SchultheissDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martitistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Antonia D E FitzekDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martitistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jana FeuerstakeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martitistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Oliver EngelDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 21075, Hamburg, Germany.
Olaf J C HellwinkelDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martitistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of the endothelial cell layer is a major criterion for the approval of organ-cultured human donor-corneas for transplantation. We wanted to compare the predictive capacities of initial endothelial density and endothelium cell morphology for the approval of donor corneas for transplantation and for the clinical outcome after transplantation.

methodsThe endothelial density and endothelium morphology in organ culture were examined by semiautomatic assessment of 1031 donor corneas. We performed a statistical analysis for correlations of donor-data and cultivation parameters regarding their predictive capacities for the final approval of donor corneas for transplantation and the clinical outcome of 202 transplanted patients.

resultsCorneal endothelium cell density proved to be the only parameter with a certain predictive capacity with regard to the final decision, whether donor corneas are suitable for transplantation - however, the correlation was low (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.655). Endothelial cell morphology lacked any predictive power (AUC = 0.597). The clinical outcome regarding visual acuity seemed to be largely independent from both corneal endothelial cell density and morphology. Sub-analyses on transplanted patients stratified for their diagnoses vindicated these findings.

conclusionsHigher endothelial density (above a cut-off level of 2000 cells/mm

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationEndothelium, CornealCell CountCorneaHumansOrgan Culture TechniquesTissue DonorsCell densityClinical outcomeCorneal endotheliumMorphology

Identifiers

PMID37115267
PMCPMC10432362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.