ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2023
Response of abundance, diversity, and network of rhizosphere fungal community to monoculture of cut chrysanthemum.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crop rotation patterns affect the growth, soil properties, and rhizosphere microbiome of cut chrysanthemums.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative metabolic profiling of the mycelium and fermentation broth of Penicillium restrictum from Peucedanum praeruptorum rhizosphere.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of different monoculture years on rhizosphere fungal communities (abundance, diversity, structure, and cooccurrence network) of cut chrysanthemum were determined. Three different monoculture years were (i) planting for only 1 year (Y1), (ii) continuous monoculture for 6 years (Y6), and (iii) continuous monoculture for 12 years (Y12). Compared to the Y1 treatment, the Y12 treatment significantly decreased the rhizosphere fungal gene copy numbers but increased the potential pathogen Fusarium oxysporum (P < 0.05). Both the Y6 and Y12 treatments significantly increased fungal diversity (Shannon and Simpson indices), but Y6 had great potential to enhance fungal richness (Chao1 index) relative to the Y12 treatment. Monoculture treatments decreased the relative abundance of Ascomycota but increased that of Mortierellomycota. Four ecological clusters (Modules 0, 3, 4, and 9) were observed in the fungal cooccurrence network across the Y1, Y6, and Y12 treatments, and only Module 0 was significantly enriched in the Y12 treatment and associated with soil properties (P < 0.05). RDA (redundancy analysis) and Mantel analysis showed that soil pH and soil nutrients (organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus) were the key factors affecting fungal communities during monoculture of cut chrysanthemum. Overall, the changes in soil properties were responsible for shaping rhizospheric soil fungal communities in long-term rather than short-term monoculture systems. KEY POINTS: • Both short- and long-term monocultures reshaped the soil fungal community structure. • Long-term monoculture enhanced the network complexity of the fungal community. • Soil pH, C and N levels mainly drove modularization in the fungal community network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37115253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.