Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115246›Full record

ArticleHNO2023

[Conception and implementation of a certification system for quality control of cochlear implant treatment in Germany. German version].

T Stöver, S K Plontke, O Guntinas-Lichius, H-J Welkoborsky, T Zahnert, K W Delank, T Deitmer, D Esser, A Dietz, A Wienke and 2 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of hearing performance in patients with borderline indication for active middle ear or cochlear implants: clinical outcomes to guide preoperative counseling and decision making.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T StöverKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Deutschland. timo.stoever@kgu.de.
S K PlontkeKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Halle, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
O Guntinas-LichiusKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
H-J WelkoborskyKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum Nordstadt, Hannover, Deutschland.
T ZahnertKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
K W DelankHals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
T Deitmer
D Esser
A DietzKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
A WienkeKanzlei WBK, Rechtsanwalt Fachanwalt Medizinrecht, Köln, Deutschland.
A LothKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Deutschland.
S DazertKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum (St. Elisabeth Hospital), Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standardized and structured process is indispensable for optimal hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI). The Executive Committee of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), initiated the conception of a certification system and a Whitepaper based on the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline (CPG) describing the current medical standards of CI care in Germany. The goal was to independently confirm implementation of this CPG and make this information publicly available. With the support of an independent certification organization, successful implementation of the CI-CPG by a hospital would then be verified and confirmed by awarding the "Cochlear implant-provision institution" (Cochlea-Implantat-versorgende Einrichtung, CIVE) quality certificate. A structure for implementation of a certification system was developed based on the CI-CPG. The following steps were required: 1) conception of a quality control system for certification of hospitals working in accordance with the CI-CPG; 2) development of required structures for an independent review of quality-relevant structure, process, and result parameters; 3) development of a standard procedure for independent certification of hospitals; 4) development of a certificate and a logo to demonstrate successful certification; 5) practical implementation of the certification. Following design of the certification system and the required organizational structure, the certification system was successfully launched in 2021. Applications for the quality certificate could be formally submitted from September 2021. A total of 51 off-site evaluations were performed by December 2022. In the first 16 months from introduction, 47 hospitals were successfully certified as CIVE. In this period, 20 experts were trained as auditors, who have since then carried out 18 on-site audits in hospitals. In summary, the conceptual design, structure, and practical implementation of a certification system for quality control in CI care was successfully implemented in Germany.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCertificationGermanyHumansQuality ControlClinical practice guidelinesImplantable neurostimulatorsProstheses and implantsQuality controlRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37115246
PMCPMC10234877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.