Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115242›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Monitoring of blood biochemical markers for periprosthetic joint infection using ensemble machine learning and UMAP embedding.

Eiryo Kawakami, Naomi Kobayashi, Yuichiro Ichihara, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Hyonmin Choe, Akito Tomoyama, Yutaka Inaba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic work-up in periprosthetic joint infections of the knee: can the albumin-to-globulin ratio be a screening tool?Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eiryo Kawakami *Medical Sciences Innovation Hub Program (MIH), RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-Cho, Tsurumi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Naomi Kobayashi *Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Cho, Minami-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan. naomik58@aol.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-0860
Yuichiro IchiharaMedical Sciences Innovation Hub Program (MIH), RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-Cho, Tsurumi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Tetsuo IshikawaMedical Sciences Innovation Hub Program (MIH), RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-Cho, Tsurumi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Hyonmin ChoeDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Akito TomoyamaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Center, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Yutaka InabaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPChiba University · JPKeio University Hospital · JPRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty. It is important to accurately identify PJI and monitor postoperative blood biochemical marker changes for the appropriate treatment strategy. In this study, we aimed to monitor the postoperative blood biochemical characteristics of PJI by contrasting with non-PJI joint replacement cases to understand how the characteristics change postoperatively. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 144 cases (52 of PJI and 92 of non-PJI) were reviewed retrospectively and split into development and validation cohorts. After exclusion of 11 cases, a total of 133 (PJI: 50, non-PJI: 83) cases were enrolled finally. An RF classifier was developed to discriminate between PJI and non-PJI cases based on 18 preoperative blood biochemical tests. We evaluated the similarity/dissimilarity between cases based on the RF model and embedded the cases in a two-dimensional space by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). The RF model developed based on preoperative data was also applied to the same 18 blood biochemical tests at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to analyze postoperative pathological changes in PJI and non-PJI. A Markov chain model was applied to calculate the transition probabilities between the two clusters after surgery.

resultsPJI and non-PJI were discriminated with the RF classifier with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.778. C-reactive protein, total protein, and blood urea nitrogen were identified as the important factors that discriminates between PJI and non-PJI patients. Two clusters corresponding to the high- and low-risk populations of PJI were identified in the UMAP embedding. The high-risk cluster, which included a high proportion of PJI patients, was characterized by higher CRP and lower hemoglobin. The frequency of postoperative recurrence to the high-risk cluster was higher in PJI than in non-PJI.

conclusionsAlthough there was overlap between PJI and non-PJI, we were able to identify subgroups of PJI in the UMAP embedding. The machine-learning-based analytical approach is promising in consecutive monitoring of diseases such as PJI with a low incidence and long-term course.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHumansRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinMachine learningPathogenesis monitoringPeriprosthetic joint infectionRandom forestUMAP embedding

Identifiers

PMID37115242
OpenAlexW4367314681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.