ArticleEuropean radiology2023
An artificial intelligence framework for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection based on
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Based Diagnostic Models for Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Pooled it
- Quantifying the Long and Short Axes of the External Iliac Lymph Nodes Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: A Potential Diagnostic Approach for Periprosthetic Joint Infection - A Prospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Trial
- Optimizing the management of periprosthetic infections with artificial intelligence: current evidence and future directions.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Is three-phase bone scintigraphy really obsolete? : a combined TPBS-CRP diagnostic method.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- The Application of artificial intelligence in periprosthetic joint infection.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Beyond Cultures: The Evolving Role of Molecular Diagnostics, Synovial Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infections.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Medical imaging diagnosis of orthopedic prosthesis-associated infections: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Development and evaluation of a 3D ensemble framework for automatic diagnosis of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on MRI: a multicenter diagnostic study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.Orthopedic reviews · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDynamic bone scintigraphy (DBS) is the first widely reliable and simple imaging modality in nuclear medicine that can be used to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We aimed to apply artificial intelligence to diagnose PJI in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) based on
methodsA total of 449 patients (255 THAs and 194 TKAs) with a final diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed. The dataset was divided into a training and validation set and an independent test set. A customized framework composed of two data preprocessing algorithms and a diagnosis model (dynamic bone scintigraphy effective neural network, DBS-eNet) was compared with mainstream modified classification models and experienced nuclear medicine specialists on corresponding datasets.
resultsIn the fivefold cross-validation test, diagnostic accuracies of 86.48% for prosthetic knee infection (PKI) and 86.33% for prosthetic hip infection (PHI) were obtained using the proposed framework. On the independent test set, the diagnostic accuracies and AUC values were 87.74% and 0.957 for PKI and 86.36% and 0.906 for PHI, respectively. The customized framework demonstrated better overall diagnostic performance compared to other classification models and showed superiority in diagnosing PKI and consistency in diagnosing PHI compared to specialists.
conclusionThe customized framework can be used to effectively and accurately diagnose PJI based on KEY POINTS: • The proposed framework in the current study achieved high diagnostic performance for prosthetic knee infection (PKI) and prosthetic hip infection (PHI) with AUC values of 0.957 and 0.906, respectively. • The customized framework demonstrated better overall diagnostic performance compared to other classification models. • Compared to experienced nuclear medicine physicians, the customized framework showed superiority in diagnosing PKI and consistency in diagnosing PHI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.