ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
The Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab as Adjuvant Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Bladder Cancer in People Living With HIV: A Retrospective Multi-Center Study.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective single-center cohort analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Real-world efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in patients living with HIV and cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Incidence of severe immune-related adverse reactions in patients with HIV and cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical Effectiveness of Tislelizumab With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Alone as Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with HIV (PLWH) have a worse prognosis than the general population. Locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) in PLWH has gradually been increasing in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve antitumor activity in the general population, but relevant data in PLWH are unknown. We thus evaluated the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab in PLWH with locally advanced or metastatic BCa.
methodsThis retrospective study included 24 patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCa, both HIV positive or negative who underwent tislelizumab treatment (200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks, Q3W) from the multi-centers between December 2019 and March 2022. Demographic details, clinical data, and cancer status were collected. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and evaluated.
resultsA total of 24 individuals were chosen for this study, 10 had HIV and the other 14 did not. The median OS in the HIV-negative group was 62.3 (95% CI, 52.6 to 72.2) was no longer than that of the PLWH group 41.9 (95% CI, 32.9 to 51.0) weeks (HR .7, [95% CI, .17 to 3.30],
conclusionThis retrospective multi-center study suggested that tislelizumab may provide encouraging antitumor activity and could be generally well tolerated. In this retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCa, it seems that PLWH may have similar overall and progression-free survival compared to HIV-negative cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.