Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37114990›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2023

Evaluating the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure Clinic: A Qualitative Assessment.

Cati Brown-Johnson, Jamie Calma, Alexis Amano, Marcy Winget, Sonia R Harris, Stacie Vilendrer, Steve M Asch, Paul Heidenreich, Alexander T Sandhu, Neil M Kalwani

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04164004 (Randomized Trial of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04164004 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Trial of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled1,249ConditionsHeart FailureArmsKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Association between the baseline health status and long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Future of Patient-Reported Outcomes: Bringing Patients' Voices Into Health Care.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cati Brown-JohnsonDivision of Primary Care and Population Health (C.B.-J., A.A., M.W., S.H., S.V., S.M.A.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.
Jamie CalmaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C., P.H., A.T.S., N.M.K.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-1336
Alexis AmanoDivision of Primary Care and Population Health (C.B.-J., A.A., M.W., S.H., S.V., S.M.A.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-2197
Marcy WingetDivision of Primary Care and Population Health (C.B.-J., A.A., M.W., S.H., S.V., S.M.A.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5893-280X
Sonia R HarrisDivision of Primary Care and Population Health (C.B.-J., A.A., M.W., S.H., S.V., S.M.A.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4599-5684
Stacie VilendrerDivision of Primary Care and Population Health (C.B.-J., A.A., M.W., S.H., S.V., S.M.A.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-5973
Steve M AschDivision of Primary Care and Population Health (C.B.-J., A.A., M.W., S.H., S.V., S.M.A.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.
Paul HeidenreichDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C., P.H., A.T.S., N.M.K.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-7730-8490
Alexander T Sandhu *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C., P.H., A.T.S., N.M.K.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3208-1143
Neil M Kalwani *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C., P.H., A.T.S., N.M.K.), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-6206

Funding

Stanford Health Services Research Training ProgramT32HS026128 · AHRQ · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, LAURENCE C, OWENS, DOUGLAS K · 2018 to 2024
$3.6M
The Effect of Value-based Payment on Heart Failure Quality of Care (Value-HF)K23HL151672 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SANDHU, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2024
$854k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026128NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL151672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) may improve care for patients with heart failure. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) is a patient survey that captures symptom frequency, symptom burden, physical limitations, social limitations, and quality of life. Despite the utility of PROs and the KCCQ-12, the implementation and routine use of these measures can be difficult. We conducted an evaluation of clinician perceptions of the KCCQ-12 to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation into clinical practice.

methodsWe conducted interviews with cardiologists from 4 institutions across the United States and Canada (n=16) and observed clinic visits at 1 institution in Northern California (n=5). Qualitative analysis was conducted in 2 rounds: (1) rapid analysis constructed around major themes related to the aims of the study and (2) content analysis with codes derived from the rapid analysis and implementation science.

resultsMost heart failure physicians and advanced practice clinicians reported that the KCCQ-12 was acceptable, appropriate, and useful in clinical care. Clinician engagement efforts, trialability, and the straightforward design of the KCCQ-12 facilitated its use in clinical care. Further opportunities identified to facilitate implementation include more streamlined integration into the electronic health record and comprehensive staff education on PROs. Participants highlighted that the KCCQ-12 was useful in clinic visits to improve the consistency of patient history taking, focus patient-clinician conversations, collect a more accurate account of patient quality of life, track trends in patient well-being over time, and refine clinical decision-making.

conclusionsIn this qualitative study, clinicians reported that the KCCQ-12 enhanced several aspects of heart failure patient care. Use of the KCCQ-12 was facilitated by a robust clinician engagement campaign and the design of the KCCQ-12 itself. Future implementation of PROs in heart failure clinic should focus on streamlining electronic health record integration and providing additional staff education on the value of PROs. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04164004.

Indexed as

Heart FailureQuality of LifeCanadaHealth StatusHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescardiologyhealth statusheart failurepatient-reported outcome measuresqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37114990
PMCPMC10192029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.