ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2023
Evaluating the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure Clinic: A Qualitative Assessment.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04164004 (Randomized Trial of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- HI-PLUS: design of a cluster-randomized trial evaluating structured case management with telemonitoring to improve quality of life in heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Trial
- The Psychometric Performance of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiac failure · 2025Trial
- Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System Implementation in Outpatient Cardiovascular Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Clinical Impact of Routine Assessment of Patient-Reported Health Status in Heart Failure Clinic: The PRO-HF Trial.Circulation · 2024Trial
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Social Networking Service-Based Mobile Patient-Generated Health Data System With Direct Electronic Medical Record Integration: Prospective Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Observational
- Bridging the Gap: Multidisciplinary Decision Making to Address Systemic Barriers in Cardiovascular Care.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Evolving Health Status Trends in Patients With Heart Failure: A Cause for Celebration or Concern?Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Mavacamten for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Targeting Sarcomeric Hypercontractility with Demonstrated Long-Term Safety and Efficacy-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Physicians' Use of Electronic Health Record Data Elements and Decision Support Tools in Heart Failure Management: User-Centered Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.Blood reviews · 2025Review
- Association between the baseline health status and long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Reliability of a German version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered via telephone.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Defining patient-reported outcomes in diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease for clinical practice guidelines - perspectives of the taskforce of the Guideline Workshop.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Electronic Health Record Alert to Promote Adoption of Limited Transthoracic Echocardiograms in Primary Care and Cardiology Clinics: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
- Future of Patient-Reported Outcomes: Bringing Patients' Voices Into Health Care.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
- Article
- Knowledge is power, can it be leveraged to improve heart failure care?European journal of heart failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) may improve care for patients with heart failure. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) is a patient survey that captures symptom frequency, symptom burden, physical limitations, social limitations, and quality of life. Despite the utility of PROs and the KCCQ-12, the implementation and routine use of these measures can be difficult. We conducted an evaluation of clinician perceptions of the KCCQ-12 to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation into clinical practice.
methodsWe conducted interviews with cardiologists from 4 institutions across the United States and Canada (n=16) and observed clinic visits at 1 institution in Northern California (n=5). Qualitative analysis was conducted in 2 rounds: (1) rapid analysis constructed around major themes related to the aims of the study and (2) content analysis with codes derived from the rapid analysis and implementation science.
resultsMost heart failure physicians and advanced practice clinicians reported that the KCCQ-12 was acceptable, appropriate, and useful in clinical care. Clinician engagement efforts, trialability, and the straightforward design of the KCCQ-12 facilitated its use in clinical care. Further opportunities identified to facilitate implementation include more streamlined integration into the electronic health record and comprehensive staff education on PROs. Participants highlighted that the KCCQ-12 was useful in clinic visits to improve the consistency of patient history taking, focus patient-clinician conversations, collect a more accurate account of patient quality of life, track trends in patient well-being over time, and refine clinical decision-making.
conclusionsIn this qualitative study, clinicians reported that the KCCQ-12 enhanced several aspects of heart failure patient care. Use of the KCCQ-12 was facilitated by a robust clinician engagement campaign and the design of the KCCQ-12 itself. Future implementation of PROs in heart failure clinic should focus on streamlining electronic health record integration and providing additional staff education on the value of PROs. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04164004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.