ArticleThe Laryngoscope2023
Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Readiness Assessment Tool: International Consensus Recommendations.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Assisted Video Monitoring for Tracheostomy-Dependent Infants: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Application of a Pediatric Tracheostomy-Specific Risk Tier System Using Administrative Data.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Article
- PEAK-II Trach: A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement/Simulation Study Assessing Pediatric Emergency Readiness.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing Pediatric Tracheostomy Care: A Survey of Peri-Operative Practices and Standardization in ASPO Members.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Combined ultrasound localization and bronchoscopic-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in a child with pharyngolaryngeal venous malformation: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Novel way of displaying Delphi responses when collecting through the REDCap data collection system.Trials · 2026Article
- The Lived Experience of Individuals with a Tracheostomy and their Caregivers: A Qualitative Analysis.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2025Article
- A Shared Vision for Tracheostomy Care: How the ICN's Updated Framework Strengthens Collaboration.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2025Article
- Delphi Consensus in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review of Reliability and Reporting Completeness.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Experiences and Educational Needs of Hospital Staff Providing Care to Tracheostomy-Dependent Pediatric Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Addressing Education and Care Gaps in Tracheostomy Management: Insights from a Multi-Stakeholder Global Survey.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2025Article
- Tracheostomy Duration Is a Key Predictor of Persistent Tracheocutaneous Fistulas in Children.Cureus · 2025Article
- Validation of a Novel Mobile Application for Assessing Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Simulations.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo achieve consensus on critical steps and create an assessment tool for actual and simulated pediatric tracheostomy emergencies that incorporates human and systems factors along with tracheostomy-specific steps.
methodsA modified Delphi method was used. Using REDCap software, an instrument comprising 29 potential items was circulated to 171 tracheostomy and simulation experts. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of consolidating and ordering 15 to 25 final items. In the first round, items were rated as "keep" or "remove". In the second and third rounds, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a 9-point Likert scale. Items were refined in subsequent iterations based on analysis of results and respondents' comments.
resultsThe response rates were 125/171 (73.1%) for the first round, 111/125 (88.8%) for the second round, and 109/125 (87.2%) for the third round. 133 comments were incorporated. Consensus (>60% participants scoring ≥8, or mean score >7.5) was reached on 22 items distributed across three domains. There were 12, 4, and 6 items in the domains of tracheostomy-specific steps, team and personnel factors, and equipment respectively.
conclusionsThe resultant assessment tool can be used to assess both tracheostomy-specific steps as well as systems factors affecting hospital team response to simulated and clinical pediatric tracheostomy emergencies. The tool can also be used to guide debriefing discussions of both simulated and clinical emergencies, and to spur quality improvement initiatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 133:3588-3601, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.