ArticleJournal of global health2023
Trends in care quality in China from 2011 to 2017: An analysis based on the National Specific (Single) Disease Monitoring System.
Article in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation analysis between single disease quality management and efficiency indicators of a tertiary hospital in China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Quality of care for acute ischemic stroke in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study using a National database.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Effect of chest pain center accreditation on timely reperfusion and in-hospital mortality for STEMI in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Construction and evaluation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Advancements and challenges of adherence to secondary prevention medications among patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: the healthcare quality improvement in China, 2007-2018.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Ministry of Health of China conducted a study targeting in single-disease quality control in 2009, aimed to strengthen quality management and improve health care services. This study retrospectively investigated the trends of quality indicators for six monitored diseases 2011-2017 to evaluate the improvement of care quality for the first batch of single-disease. Methods: We extracted data from the National Specific (Single) Disease Monitoring System for 2011-2017. We focused on six conditions: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, community-acquired pneumonia, coronary artery bypass graft, hip / knee replacement, and acute ischemic stroke. A total of 56 quality indicators (QIs) were adopted to monitor the quality change and determine the trends in care quality. We also calculated the hospital process composite performance (HPCP) using a denominator-based weighting method for each hospital per year. The estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) 2011-2017 were calculated at national and regional levels. Results: The results showed that use of four QIs had significant downward trends, whereas 25 QIs (including reversed indicators) showed significant upward trends from 2011 to 2017. The greatest improvement was observed in CAP-4 (antibiotic treatment within four hours after admission to the hospital for critical pneumonia) in the central region (EAPC = 48.36, 95% CI = 15.92-89.87); while the largest decrease appeared in AIS-1 (thrombolytic therapy within 4.5 hours of symptom onset) in the western region (EAPC = -13.44, 95% CI = -24.98,-0.11). An increased HPCP was observed in four diseases nationwide, but not for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. However, there were significant differences across regions in the process of care and outcomes, with the performance of Eastern and Western regions showing remarkable advantages compared with the Central region. Conclusions: We provide evidence for major advancement in care quality in China nationwide. However, the improvement of care in China was unbalanced geographically and should be carefully considered. Future challenges include expanding the coverage of quality monitoring, greater delivery efficiency, and region-balanced health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.