Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37114229›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2023

A review of the geometrical basis and the principles underlying the use and interpretation of the video head impulse test (vHIT) in clinical vestibular testing.

Ian S Curthoys, Leigh A McGarvie, Hamish G MacDougall, Ann M Burgess, Gabor M Halmagyi, Jorge Rey-Martinez, Julia Dlugaiczyk

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Clinical application of dynamic visual acuity testing in patients with vestibular migraine].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ian S CurthoysVestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Leigh A McGarvieNeurology Department, Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Hamish G MacDougallInstitute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Ann M BurgessVestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gabor M HalmagyiNeurology Department, Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Jorge Rey-MartinezNeurotology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Julia DlugaiczykDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Interdisciplinary Center of Vertigo, Balance and Ocular Motor Disorders, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is concerned mainly with the assumptions underpinning the actual testing procedure, measurement, and interpretation of the video head impulse test-vHIT. Other papers have reported in detail the artifacts which can interfere with obtaining accurate eye movement results, but here we focus not on artifacts, but on the basic questions about the assumptions and geometrical considerations by which vHIT works. These matters are crucial in understanding and appropriately interpreting the results obtained, especially as vHIT is now being applied to central disorders. The interpretation of the eye velocity responses relies on thorough knowledge of the factors which can affect the response-for example the orientation of the goggles on the head, the head pitch, and the contribution of vertical canals to the horizontal canal response. We highlight some of these issues and point to future developments and improvements. The paper assumes knowledge of how vHIT testing is conducted.

Indexed as

head impulse testingHIMPsHITSHIMPsvestibularvHITVOR

Identifiers

PMID37114229
PMCPMC10126377
OpenAlexW4364360118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.