ArticleBiophysical reports2023
Super-resolution reconstruction in ultrahigh-field MRI.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a highly significant imaging platform for a variety of medical and research applications. However, the low spatiotemporal resolution of conventional MRI limits its applicability toward rapid acquisition of ultrahigh-resolution scans. Current aims at high-resolution MRI focus on increasing the accuracy of tissue delineation, assessments of structural integrity, and early identification of malignancies. Unfortunately, high-resolution imaging often leads to decreased signal/noise (SNR) and contrast/noise (CNR) ratios and increased time cost, which are unfeasible in many clinical and academic settings, offsetting any potential benefits. In this study, we apply and assess the efficacy of super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) through iterative back-projection utilizing through-plane voxel offsets. SRR allows for high-resolution imaging in condensed time frames. Rat skulls and archerfish samples, typical models in academic settings, were used to demonstrate the impact of SRR on varying sample sizes and applicability for translational and comparative neuroscience. The SNR and CNR increased in samples that did not fully occupy the imaging probe and in instances where the low-resolution data were acquired in three dimensions, while the CNR was found to increase with both 3D and 2D low-resolution data reconstructions when compared with directly acquired high-resolution images. Limitations to the applied SRR algorithm were investigated to determine the maximum ratios between low-resolution inputs and high-resolution reconstructions and the overall cost effectivity of the strategy. Overall, the study revealed that SRR could be used to decrease image acquisition time, increase the CNR in nearly all instances, and increase the SNR in small samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.