ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023
Cerebral oximetry monitoring by means of INVOS-4100 as a predictor of ischemic events during carotid endarterectomy.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Induction-Phase rSOJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Selective cerebral perfusion for reduced cerebral blood flow during debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several methods have been proposed to monitor cerebral perfusion during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), with the purpose of minimizing the risk of perioperative stroke. The INVOS-4100 is able to detect cerebral oxygen saturation providing an intraoperative real-time monitoring system of cerebral oximetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the INVOS-4100 in predicting cerebral ischemia during CEA. Methods: Between January 2020 and May 2022, 68 consecutive patients were scheduled for CEA either under general anesthesia or regional anesthesia with deep and superficial cervical block. Vascular oxygen saturation was recorded continually through INVOS before and during clamping of the ICA. Awake testing was performed in the group of patients undergoing CEA under regional anesthesia. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included; 43 were males (63.2%). Severe stenosis of the artery was present in 92%. Forty-one (60.3%) patients were monitored by INVOS, while 22 (39.7%) underwent awake testing. Mean clamping time was 20 ± 6.6 min. Patients undergoing awake testing had a lower hospital stay and ICU stay during admission ( Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that cerebral oximetry monitoring was a strong predictor of cerebral ischemia, although it was not possible to determine the non-inferiority of cerebral oximetry compared to awake testing. Nonetheless, the use of cerebral oximetry evaluates only perfusion in the superficial brain tissue and an absolute rSO2 value corresponding to significant cerebral ischemia has not been established. Therefore, larger prospective studies that correlate cerebral oximetry with neurologic outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.